<semisimple> I am sure some have heard of it already, but Google "published" a paper where they claim to have found more efficient quantum algorithms to attack ECDLP (quantumai.google/static/site-assets…loads/cryptocurrency-whitepaper.pdf). ECDLP-256 is not yet broken, but it seems the timeline has moved forward. The infuritati [... too long, see mrelay.p2pool.observer/e/8qH4-fQKdi0yemFz ]

<syntheticbird> This is the right place but formal proposition of chapter addition to the meeting you should ask on github. Just to make sure Rucknium see it. He could also see it here, if he passes by.

<syntheticbird> The topic of PQ economical safety has been brought up before and after my issue, and i've been happy to see theorycrafting but it quickly faded because of the HUGE influx of topics to discuss. Yesterday in tech meeting the PQ migration has also been mentioned. I would support resuming discussion about it at next meeting.

<semisimple> I know it is a incredibly broad topic and pretty much all security claims fall flat when faced with a quantum attacker, but the paper explicitly analyses the impact on some privacy coins (mostly ZCASH). I think it would make sense to get a quick consensus opinion from the community on what the concrete impact would be on Moner [... too long, see mrelay.p2pool.observer/e/--W2-vQKVHNoZ1I2 ]

They also posted this: