<metatron_:matrix.org> 👍️

<rucknium> MRL meeting in this room in two hours.

<rucknium> Meeting time! monero-project/meta #1451

<rucknium> 1. Greetings

<slowbeardigger:matrix.org> hello

<ravfx:xmr.mx> o/

Hello

<jpk68:matrix.org> Hello

<articmine> Hi

<vtnerd> hi

<boog900> hi

<ack-j:matrix.org> Hi

<jberman> waves

<jeffro256> Howdy

<rucknium> 2. Updates. What is everyone working on?

<jeffro256> me: carrot_core reviews, Carot spec changes, and hot-cold PR seraphis-migration/monero #52. Did a lot of big changes to that PR

<jberman> some upstream PR review, and have started up again working on Serai

<vtnerd> me: finally making a lws signed 1.0 release in the next couple of days (hopefully the last bug fix was just pushed); working on monerod serialization; reviews

<jpk68:matrix.org> Me: worked on replacing GNU Readline, updating and reviewing PRs, doing some hardware wallet testing

<rucknium> me: Wrote a draft of methodology for using monerism to estimate the effectiveness of spy node adversaries: gist.github.com/Rucknium/ba230a2bab8a446d0997b7b002bf3af6

<rucknium> 3. FCMP++ to-do list status. Programming tasks (seraphis-migration/monero #53). Reviews and audits (cryptpad.fr/sheet/#/2/sheet/view/yP…9VF6GYm9bXbPdCerdST3UDEEfBxcM/embed). FCMP++ Integration Audit Overview (seraphis-migration/monero #294). Network upgrade [... too long, see mrelay.p2pool.observer/e/-cPd5KYLLTJvdW5y ]

<ack-j:matrix.org> MAGIC: set up an automated security review of monero PRs

<ack-j:matrix.org> github.com/xmrack/monero-review/issues

<gingeropolous> me: server maintenance. spinny 40TB lives on. optane drives FTW. contemplating another CCS. Fixing / improving monerosim.

<vtnerd> @ack-j:matrix.orgthese are automated AI reviews? will need to bookmark this

<jberman> @boog900:monero.social reviewed and approved the tx relay v2 major changes over here seraphis-migration/monero #450 (I still need to respond to that last comment there, but minor point). So that one is cleared for beta stressnet v3

<gingeropolous> me: contemplating if a ccs could cover a tesla powerwall (or equivalent) so we can stop having these damn outages ....

<ack-j:matrix.org> @vtnerd:monero.social: yes. I have opus-5 scan a new pr from a queue every 30 minutes. Each time the pr’s hash changes it gets back inline for the queue

<jberman> @jeffro256:monero.social made good progress on hot/cold wallets looks like, which we want in before stressnet v3 as well

<slowbeardigger:matrix.org> @ack-j:matrix.org: Is it there any consideration of switching AI models?

<slowbeardigger:matrix.org> Claude models got a little bit “worse”

<jberman> Re: Research Tasks. The current remaining major task is having circuit + gadgets impl re-audited, and the fcmp-plus-plus audited. We're currently fielding quotes and talking to candidates answering questions etc.

<jeffro256> I don't have much to add except that review and upstreaming is ongoing

<rucknium> Anything more on this topic?

<rucknium> 4. Relative locks with FCMP++ (monero-project/research-lab #161).

<rucknium> After the meeting, @loop.ster:matrix.org said:

<rucknium> > Don't get me wrong, I am interested in pursuing this, it's about how much time I can spend on it. If it's completely pro bono -- my working assumption --, it's like 10% of my time, tops, and I'll be using AI to help accelerate things. So I can't commit to some deadline of "produce a spec by XX date or else timelocks don't get merged".

<rucknium> > What's encouraging is that there wasn't anyone against merging the time locks from what I could tell, so that's a very positive indicator.[... more lines follow, see mrelay.p2pool.observer/e/ur6U6qQLdzdNQXVF ]

<rucknium> And that mrelay link is a 404 for me now. Can anyone else see it?

<slowbeardigger:matrix.org> 404 for me as well

<rucknium> Ah, I can find the old Matrix chat room:

<rucknium> > Basically what I can offer is that if there's a general understanding that I am working on a spec, as time permits, along with the idea that relative locks probably do get merged -- that could work. That way we're not stuck at point 0, and in a month or so, we can compare notes again and maybe we're at a point where things can solidify a bit.

<jberman> One point I was kind of getting at: I think even work on this spec would potentially be a solid candidate for a CCS proposal. It would be helpful Research to help solidify adding features to Monero's consensus

<loop.ster:matrix.org> oh I see. I read it as, write the spec and then maybe..

<jberman> nay, sorry I was unclear

<loop.ster:matrix.org> cool, well I suspect I'll have some cycles next week to work on grease. I didn't move anything fwd this week

<jberman> my main point being I think that continuing on the path of exploring working with that feature would be appreciated

<rucknium> Any more discussion of this topic?

<loop.ster:matrix.org> nothing from me

<jberman> same, thank you @loop.ster:matrix.org

<rucknium> 5. FCMP beta stressnet (github.com/seraphis-migration/monero/releases). Version 3 launch checklist (seraphis-migration/monero #415).

<jberman> It's just hot/cold wallet stuff now, we're working on it

<jeffro256> Al the major changes from j-berman's review are done AFAICT, just renamings left

<rucknium> Thanks, @jberman:monero.social and @jeffro256:monero.social .

<rucknium> Looks like this is going to be a short meeting.

<rucknium> We can end the meeting here. Thanks everyone.

<articmine> Thanks

exit