-
plowsofgetting monero-gui verified* on flathub yes/no monero-project/monero-site #2200
-
m-relay<123bob123:matrix.org> discourse.flathub.org/t/how-do-you-…-a-flathub-submission-verified/3714
-
m-relay<123bob123:matrix.org> Looks like realise on developer?
-
m-relay<plowsof:matrix.org> Dan 🤐 alderman (Is not the man & Braxman Tomsparks Advocate ): thanks for searching, the 'how' part has all been handled for us, now its just a matter of ' but verified makes people think they never have to confirm hashes! or it will convey some other message '
-
m-relay<123bob123:matrix.org> Gives the illusion of being “offical”
-
m-relay<123bob123:matrix.org> But if the key is on getmonero site, they have the option of removing it, if flathub repo goes cold
-
m-relay<plowsof:matrix.org> the maintenance ccs is coming up to a year ccs.getmonero.org/proposals/maintaining-flatpak-package.html
-
m-relay<plowsof:matrix.org> monero core repo on github will push to flathub infra. flathub infra can still be haxed (as any infra can) but the hashes on the github workflow run can be matched
-
m-relay<123bob123:matrix.org> So you dont what people to be complacent?
-
plowsof
-
m-relay<ofrnxmr:agoradesk.com> I think if flatpak politics are too much trouble, that at some point we look into replicatinf the featherwallet build
-
m-relay<ofrnxmr:agoradesk.com> Or streamlining the feather build, so other wallets such as gui, cake, stack.. monerod, gupax, whatever, can all use flatpaks without flathub
-
m-relay<123bob123:matrix.org> what about hosting own repo?