at one point this room was a bit more off topic

<b​asses:matrix.org> youtube.com/watch?v=WkphgF6Hn4w

<b​asses:matrix.org> >How Monero Users Get Traced (RUN YOUR OWN NODE!)

<k​ewbit:matrix.org> kewbit.org/simplified-explanation-of-seraphis

<k​ewbit:matrix.org> In case anyone’s interested

<a​mmortel:monero.social> It seems to me, that if I change the word "Seraphis" to "Monero" in this article, everything still makes completely sense. Is Monero already using Seraphis? What's the difference?

<k​ewbit:matrix.org> I think if you’re asking that question try having a read of the white paper as you’re already probably an semi experienced user. In essence most people understand things like transactions ring signatures but some of this is just math that the only way to explain it is be reading the original published paper. I’m appealing it to the less technical explanation in some parts se<clipped message>

<k​ewbit:matrix.org> em and may seem ‘repetitive’ but they can use it as an entry point to ask themselves more questions. Otherwise how are all these talented developers going to get the funding, I just worry if people don’t have somewhere to at a least start, they have probably have no much chance in supporting their contributions, I can do another one maybe tomorrow with more technical detail <clipped message>

<k​ewbit:matrix.org> or I might start putting a tooltip feature which tries to pop up a model with the really advanced stuff, but thank you for the feedback!

<k​ewbit:matrix.org> ammortel:

why explain seraphis if it is not used and probably will not be

<r​ottenwheel:kernal.eu> Share it in Revuo's room too. Will add it to this week's issue like I did with CARROT blog post. Keep it up!

Hi guys

Hello

<r​ottenwheel:kernal.eu> x.com/revuoxmr/status/1842963892299063553

<r​ottenwheel:kernal.eu> nitter: xcancel.com/revuoxmr/status/1842963892299063553

Hi

Hi ableone and seccoder030

<s​yntheticbird:monero.social> Fun fact: Calcium is a metal.

<h​bs:matrix.org> I'm playing with monero-lws but I can't seem to ever see transactions reported by get_address_txs with 'mempool' set to true even though I'm using the same node as monero-lws to send my txs there some magic options to either monerod or monero-lws to see the tx as soon as they arrive in the mempool?

<h​bs:matrix.org> I'm playing with monero-lws but I can't seem to ever see transactions reported by get_address_txs with 'mempool' set to true even though I'm using the same node as monero-lws to send my txs, is there some magic options to either monerod or monero-lws to see the tx as soon as they arrive in the mempool?

<3​21bob321:monero.social> Maybe vtnerd knows

<v​tnerd:monero.social> hbs: it's a limitation of LWS DB layout. LWS can report mempool transactions via webhook immediately but they won't show up via REST until in a block.

<d​ave.jp:matrix.org> vtnerd: Thanks for working on LWS. Do you have any idea when it will be production ready and easy to deploy for end users? Is there a guide available on how to install it for Windows? Also, are you in touch with any wallet developers who are integrating LWS?

<h​bs:matrix.org> Thanks, so the reply to a get_address_txs will always have mempool set to false I guess.

<v​tnerd:monero.social> depends on use. There are at least two dev teams that seem to be using it in production, but purely as an instant tracking tool for payments. Switching to boost::beast recently is a long ways to making it more production ready - after a few rounds of edits REST endpoints will no longer have blocking I/O (which currently makes the REST server appear unresponsive when it's actually <clipped message>

<v​tnerd:monero.social> a remote call that is unresponsive). I know of no wallet developers integrating LWS unfortunately. I have a lwsf project which is attempting a frontend c++ API, along with woodser and everodandeven effort at resurrecting lws in wallet2

<d​ave.jp:matrix.org> Will it be production-ready by FCM++? Perhaps within 12–18 months?

<d​ave.jp:matrix.org> Will it be production-ready by FCMP++? Perhaps within 12–18 months?

<h​bs:matrix.org> Do you think it would be feasible to also store the tx from the mempool in the DB? Where can I find the current DB layout description?