<3​21bob321:monero.social> open alias just resolves the address ?

<3​21bob321:monero.social> i assume the wallet uses local dns resolver ?

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> No

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> i believe so

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> No, the node doesn't do any resolution, only the wallet does

<p​olytheistic:matrix.org> I don't get the difference between the hats :/

<f​reedom-quester:matrix.org> xenu: Hi, are you the same person as Xenu from antimoonboy.com, if so please get in touch via our usual method to get me know it's you. 🙂

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Yes

<f​reedom-quester:matrix.org> xenu: Hi, are you the same person as Xenu from antimoonboy.com, if so please let in touch via our usual method to get me know it's you. 🙂

<f​reedom-quester:matrix.org> Who are you saying yes to?

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> You

<f​reedom-quester:matrix.org> Well, you have AI in your name, so (with all due respect) I don't know if I can trust your "information"

<f​reedom-quester:matrix.org> xenu: Hi, are you the same person as Xenu from antimoonboy.com, if so please get in touch via our usual method to let me know it's you. 🙂

<a​mmortel:monero.social> Guys

<a​mmortel:monero.social> Rather than not allowing us to initiate a tx with unconfirmed funds, could we not have a separate mempool for tx with unconfirmed funds inputs? They would stay there for 20 minutes and then go to the actual mempool when confirmed.

<a​mmortel:monero.social> If I know that I want to initiate a tx with my coming funds, I should be able to do so. Even if it's accepted later.

<a​mmortel:monero.social> I should not have to wait 20 minutes to do the action later. A lot of things can happen in 20 minutes and I might be prevented from waiting or signing the tx later

<e​inliterflasche2:matrix.org> The point of the 10 block lock is to make it harder to spot the real inputs of a transaction. If not for the 10 block limit, then people would directly spend the UTXO, which would provide a good heuristic for chain analysis. It

<e​inliterflasche2:matrix.org> It would compromise privacy. Being able to publish transactions spending unconfirmed funds directly, even if they're not would compromise privacy in the same way. I think.

<a​mmortel:monero.social> So there is hope to lower the 10 block limit with the upcoming FCMP++ update ?

<a​mmortel:monero.social> Since there will be no more possible analysis of UTXO

<k​evino:tchncs.de> I don't think there are any proposals for that

I'm at 84% downloading the blockchain, and it is very slow. I find that I am only getting ~1.22K/s. Is it that no one is sharing?

It is 9.3 days before I can start mining. I am sharing 100% of the blockchain, but it looks like no one else is. Am I a fool?

<k​ingdomkind:matrix.org> mine was much quicker

<k​ingdomkind:matrix.org> i'd guess its an issue on your end

<k​ingdomkind:matrix.org> assuming you mean KB/s

jnettop doesn't say whether b or B.

I have absolutely no firewall blocks.

<k​ingdomkind:matrix.org> could be ISP throttling? Unsure

<k​ingdomkind:matrix.org> i completed all of it recently in probably about 20 hours total for the full blockchain

<k​ingdomkind:matrix.org> perhaps, 20-30 hours

<c​mos:matrix.stargazypie.xyz> That's about how long it took me, the last blacks took the longest

I started with the blockchain.raw file, and from there 76% with the daemon. I'd never get there if I relied solely on the daemon.

I get 8-9MB/s in torrent when I use t.

Ok the last blocks being slowest shows that no one is sharing.

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Yes, you're a fool

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> jk

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Its not possible for "no one" to be sharing. Everyone running a node is sharing their blockchain

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> If "no one" was sharing, the monero would stop working

<c​mos:matrix.stargazypie.xyz> And wallets like cake wouldn't be able to scan blockchain

<k​ayabanerve:matrix.org> ammortel @ammortel:monero.social: FCMP++ allows delegating the membership proof. You can sign a transaction, send the signature to a third party, and they (if honest) can publish the TX 10 blocks later when the network will accept it. The third party will learn the outputs being spent however.

<k​ayabanerve:matrix.org> The Monero network won't have a decentralized 'second mempool' of such functionality however.

<a​mmortel:monero.social> Would it not be good ?

<k​ayabanerve:matrix.org> A third party who is delegated to

<k​ayabanerve:matrix.org> 1) Learns the outputs spent

<k​ayabanerve:matrix.org> 2) Has to do non-trivial work

<k​ayabanerve:matrix.org> Which is why there shouldn't be such an open network to that effect.

<a​tomfried:matrix.org> Some time back i think there was some talk about recursive.meta proofs with fcmp which could be possible.

<a​tomfried:matrix.org> If i remember correctly the idea was that miners combije all proofs to one mega proof per block.

<a​tomfried:matrix.org> Is there and work in that direction?

<b​inarybaron:matrix.org> very cool