muffinmeow: just listing their name without <> pings, or you can do @kiersten:matrix.org

ah okay, thanks

or well, @kiersten5821:matrix.org

but should work without @

noted!

<gan:skhron.org> DataHoarder: none of that's an intentional mention, therefore might not cause a ping

what about this gan:skhron.org :)

nope

<gan:skhron.org> DataHoarder: nah

<mrcharles-xmr:matrix.org> One artwork per block (Prototype) : kirp6xiw6vipglugnepkynyublvvlwks4j3lcppov7h3dgb4tiuz56ad.onion

<fallenserenity:matrix.org> I’m a bit confused. Why do subaddresses not change for every transaction like it does for main (stealth) addresses? Shouldn’t the receiving address, even a subaddress, change every transaction so that it can’t be correlated with your account?

it's just centralized NFT

fallenserenity:matrix.org: it cannot change when you place it somewhere

you can always just give new ones

it works differently than on coins with public outputs and addresses, there is no need to use unique sending addresses (if people are just looking at explorers/chain data)

"main (stealth) addresses" < I think you are confusing main address and stealth addresses

stealth address is something derived from a main address/sub address, and a per-tx key, which creates the per-tx stealth address. The sender does this.

DataHoarder, most mainstream NFTs were centralized too. Was there ever a legitimate use for those?..

this is even more centralized :)

for the hated mordinals they still left the data behind even when their site is fully dead (see ugly thing blocks.p2pool.observer/tx/baa3f1fa7…8dd2664eefe634bdbd260d58d09d2a0e259 )

they are there to bulk up the pruned data forever :)

<gan:skhron.org> BlueyHealer: Plenty of legitimate usage, but that discussion is more suitable for the offtopic

<gan:skhron.org> True

ok

DataHoarder, lol didn't know this was a real thing, assumed it was just a proposal XD

nah they spammed the network for quite a while and damaging privacy

they got limited and tried to bypass it, but then gave up

FCMP++ upgrade does limit tx extra a bit more (still allows reasonable usage)

current change is a relay/soft rule, so blocks can still appear with it fine, but FCMP++ will make that a consensus rule

Oh, that's horrible. So are no new ones created at least?

site is dead and required a custom badly made fork of the client/wallet so nothing so far

transfers also just used dummy decoys and outputs so they damaged privacy as well :)

oh

Thanks!

hi everyone, i have a question regarding accounts, when regenerating a wallet using the seed phrase, do your different accounts persist like subaddresses would, or do your funds all get pooled into the primary account?

<rbrunner7> No, accounts are restored in the same way as subaddresses are: After the restore, your whole wallet structure is there again