-
m-relay
<not-from-the-irs:monero.social> I reformatted my y computer with element installed and now I can’t verify its me -_-
-
m-relay
<killercat103:xmr.se> There goes your encrypted messages :/
-
m-relay
<not-from-the-irs:monero.social> Oh well. Ill just make a new profile I guess
-
m-relay
<not-from-the-irs:monero.social> Thanks for the heads up
-
m-relay
<not-from-the-irs:monero.social> Didnt even realize that was the case..
-
m-relay
<not-from-the-irs:monero.social> Ill be back lol
-
m-relay
<killercat103:xmr.se> You don't really have to make an entirely new profile. Just throw away encrypted messages
-
m-relay
<killercat103:xmr.se> verified profiles are also unverified now
-
Inge
what is xmr.se?
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> Inge: I just see a block explorer at xmr.se. You mean who is running that? If yes, no idea. Maybe this is also a seed node?
-
sech1
Someone running it in a Stockholm data center:
obe.net/hosting
-
Inge
I also see killercat103 seems to be on xmr.se?
-
Inge
like a matrix server or something?
-
m-relay
<killercat103:xmr.se> Oh hi. Tried it cuz it didn't require email which i thought was cool
-
sech1
Well, someone from Stockholm (not me) is probably running it
-
m-relay
<killercat103:xmr.se> I don't think the room directory is public but it feels good enough in speed and theres a matrix room to talk about the instance so im satisfied
-
sech1
Maybe the same person who put XMR sticker all over Stockholm :D
-
sech1
*stickers
-
m-relay
<killercat103:xmr.se> You need to sign up with a matrix client. No client on the website
-
plowsof
the impromptu meeting tomorrow for initial feedback / round up of luigis ccs proposal
monero-project/meta #934#issuecomment-1847323570
-
plowsof
an upcoming feather wallet release from tobtoht will also be shared (with offline signing with easy user experience)
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> plowsof: Clever, getting more people to join the meeting by tempting them with a freebie :)
-
nioc
I will miss the meeting
-
nioc
what freebie will I be missing?
-
m-relay
<plowsof:matrix.org> only the latest and greatest in cold signing monero transactions with secure optical data transfer technology from the new feather wallet release
-
m-relay
<plowsof:matrix.org> some of our very own feline friends who are CLI maxis may even be tempted to use it
-
dsc_
i wont support this animated QR stuff for my hw wallet project
-
dsc_
grabbing a phone is a bit too much effort
-
dsc_
however for feather desktop it makes sense
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Do you think wowlet will do it too 😲
-
dsc_
probably not
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> but, i read it in the whitepaper
-
dsc_
i.imgur.com/eocCabq.png here is a pic of feather running on a $15 computer btw
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Jkn. I cant even read.
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> I think offline signing will come to other wallets too
-
dsc_
uhm, the graph moves, bad frame
-
m-relay
<izzzy:matrix.org> How far off is Seraphis? Like ballpark. Next year, 2 or more? That's assuming it doesn't run into a hole or something. The community is focused on release, right? Any major doubts?
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> "Well that was an awkward silence"
-
m-relay
<izzzy:matrix.org> oh jez, did I say something wrong?
-
m-relay
<izzzy:matrix.org> should I get my coat?
-
m-relay
<plowsof:matrix.org> lol
-
m-relay
<plowsof:matrix.org> #no-wallet-left-behind:monero.social workgroup headed by rbrunner7 are pushing seraphis forward
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> I give a ballpark of 2 years (from now) and knowing that you usually underestimate such things easily by half I land at 3 years until we really hardfork. Just think about the 2 dozen or so wallets that all need to adjust for a smooth transition, ideally. Plus integrations for between 5 to 10 programming languages. And Haveno. And Serai. I better stop :)
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> But yeah, we really do focus on this.
-
m-relay
<izzzy:matrix.org> Many thanks. Glad to find No Wallet Left Behind too
-
m-relay
<izzzy:matrix.org> I keep seeing talk of it, but had no picture of when.
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Its always need 2+n years away
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Youll know when, after things start to take shape
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> Almost like fusion is always 50 years away, no?
-
m-relay
<izzzy:matrix.org> Not a good idea? I mean Seraphis
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Been**
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Rbrunner - right. Then magically 1 day, its 90 days out.
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> Well, soon jberman, jeffro256 and dangerousfreedom will more or less run out of other big things to program for the cdebase, so there is hope.
-
m-relay
<izzzy:matrix.org> lol I think I stepped into something
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Thing are coming together, but not yet to a point where you can say "all we have to do is a b c and j , polish q and test r, then were done"
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> Except multisig maybe, that may develop into a distraction from Seraphis ...
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Polyseed is being implemented by wallets now, instead of waiting for the hard fork
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Thats 1 less change that people need to make at the time
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> Yes, which is nice. Pressure mounts for the "official" wallet to lift their asses
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> *wallets
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Even once seraphis is ready, services need to be prepared for address and seed changes
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Doing the seed now means they can keep the same wallet moving forward
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> Yes. Surprise: Those very long addresses will probably get longer still :)
-
m-relay
<rucknium:monero.social> Is Polyseed related to Seraphis changes?
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Jamtis requires it iirc
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> But it doesnt require jamtis
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> I would say no. Just a different way to arrive at "the" private key. But people will learn to handle it, so less confusion for the hardfork, as I see it.
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Or maybe its seraphis.
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> ill shutup now
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> But yeah. I think its better is the majority of users are on their new seeds _before_ the fork. Then they dont have to create new wallets and move their funds all at the same time
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Jamtis + polyseed at the same time is a pretty major change to make. New seeds and addresses = new wallet. Seraphis = new protocol.
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> so its like a whole new blockchain. Hard forks can be contentious enough. Id prefer a "smooth transition"
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> at least, as smooth as possible
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> Yes. I once called it *Monero 2.0* or *Monero New Generation* and got flak immediately :)
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Also, fcmp if it comes at the same time, changes everything again
-
m-relay
<izzzy:matrix.org> But I imagine it will be seen like that. 2 protocols with the same aim
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> Or better, changes even more.
-
m-relay
<rucknium:monero.social> izzzy: Users won't need a new seed. The 25 word seeds will not be deprecated. Polyseed is convenient and optional.
-
m-relay
<izzzy:matrix.org> I'd say a lot more than convenient. A damned good thing to happen
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> Ask dEBRUYNE about support nightmares because of wrong restore height.
-
m-relay
<rucknium:monero.social> rbrunner7: I know :)
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> I swear koe or tevador were questioning whether to even support converting 16 > 25, since the plan was to drop 25
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> 25 has issues
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> Well, you can't stop people from programming that, it's not difficult at all to give out those bits, decided by Polyseed, as a legacy 25 word seed
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> Basically one line of code and an interactive way to bring that to execution
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> > since the plan was to drop 25
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> Er... no.
-
m-relay
<rucknium:monero.social> There are many multicoin wallets that have a single BIP39 seed phrase for all coins, including Monero. They usually use a custom method to convert the BIP39 to a Monero seed. Probably those wallets will still use the 25 word Monero seed phrase because BIP39 does not encode store height.
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> Looks like that to me as well.
-
m-relay
<rucknium:monero.social> * restore height. Not store height
-
msvb-lab
rucknium: I assumed that the 25th word was extra key information and not related to the block height at time of creation. Can you explain this?
-
msvb-lab
Because your comment makes it sound like it is used to encode some block number, which seems impossible because keys are made without connectivity sometimes.
-
m-relay
<rucknium:monero.social> The 25th word is a checksum. It will be one of the first 24 words. The 25 word seed phrases do not encode restore height.
-
m-relay
<rucknium:monero.social> Polyseed does encode restore height.
-
m-relay
<rucknium:monero.social> I am saying that the specified multicoin wallets probably won't use polyseed.
-
m-relay
<rbrunner7:monero.social> If you don't have connectivity, and your daemon is behind, all that will happen is that you get a restore height that's too low. No drama as long as you don't start at the genesis block
-
plowsof
it guesses the blockheight from the date (there is some date far in the future where it can't guess anymore.. i forgot)
-
m-relay
<voidastro:matrix.org> if a monero address never leaks (ex. wallet primary address) can a future quantum computer tie all or any of it's stealth addresses together?
-
m-relay
<ofrnxmr:monero.social> Maybe a better q for Monero Research Lounge
-
dsc_
so for this 'hw wallet' i'm attempting, it will sit on your LAN and in order to make a transaction you'll use any other device to browse to its web-interface
-
dsc_
but any outgoing transaction will need to be confirmed by phyiscally operating the touchscreen
-
dsc_
in terms of attack surface it sits somewhere between a Trezor and a airgapped old thinkpad
-
dsc_
no, attack surface is the wrong word
-
dsc_
in terms of 'security', i.e: since the private key is not on your computer or mobile it is more safe than that, but not safer than a Trezor because they have a secure element
-
dsc_
so people with certain requirements should look into trezor/ledger
-
dsc_
I'm trying to make a touchscreen device for casual users who do 1) do not want to store it on the exchange 2) want a good user-experience 3) want to prevent storing private keys on the devices they daily drive
-
dsc_
-
dsc_
and a nice 5" matte (non-reflective) display
-
dsc_
its meant to always be on, so you can put it somewhere in the home and display a cool dashboard with tickers or whatever
-
dsc_
ill be 3D printing some case
-
dsc_
granted more of a hobby project for myself but if people have e.g raspberry pi lying around it could be cool for them
-
dsc_
might also build in bitcoin support while I am at it