sooo CCS is soon™ back?

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> For christmassss

<a​js_:matrix.org> Update on MoneroKon: crowdfunding campaign to form a nonprofit ends on New Years: funding.monerokon.com

<a​js_:matrix.org> We've raised enough to pay for immediate expenses.. big thank you to all donors!

<a​js_:matrix.org> any unraised amount by the deadline will be rolled into general operation costs of MoneroKon 2024

It would let us see if n1oc hasn't given up on checking the funding required page

I asked the outreach/social media department for a catchy title and after some brainstorming they offered "Do they know it's CCS'mas time again?"

<4​rkal:monero.social> 4rkal.eu.org/posts/coldstorage

<4​rkal:monero.social> 4rkal.eu.org/posts/feathernero

<4​rkal:monero.social> Feather X Anonero

<4​rkal:monero.social> Complete guide on how to use featherwallet with anonero for cold storage. Using only animated QR codes!

Nice 4rkal, Thanks! The joys when projects decide on a UR standard for transferring monero tx data. A useful guide .. one day the MoneroSeedSigner will be compatible

<1​23bob123:matrix.org> Soon™️

<p​lowsof:matrix.org> would 0.001 xmr be enough to subsidise 3 months of ccs tx fees?

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> I dont think so. Consolidations if the donations probably cost more

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Of*

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Maybe .004 is ~300 donations and 27 payouts

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> If

<p​lowsof:matrix.org> i was thinking about flexing on BTC with a test milestone for x transactions

<p​lowsof:matrix.org> as milestone 1 for this test ccs proposal... or

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> .004 is only 71c for 27 transactions

<p​lowsof:matrix.org> suspiciously close to 69 cents

<p​lowsof:matrix.org> open for suggestions / corrections repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/427

<p​lowsof:matrix.org> e.g. maybe the details of the new wallet setup are incorrect luigi1111

CCS fundraiser for 0.004 xmr :D

Yeah 0.004 too low prob

when are proposals being moved to funding required?

Make it 0.069

Waiting on confirmation of backend change

thx

sounds perfect , will do . "feed the devs" sound track for this proposal yewtu.be/watch?v=j3fSknbR7Y4

amounts fixed luigi1111

details pending review

bridge is restarting in a few minutes to add Townforge channels

Hi, i have lost all my saved money to FTX jews around 20000 dollars.

Please help me live. Please help me.

BTC :   bc1q9vfmfwj6av9pxj50r6xyl652mwhqvw5ds86nw2

xmr: 44QNNugXXCWUcUGi7UGsRM4pqnKKmn4zYjcZT3BnNHWBWyXRoe4mfLwT5L67kGyTLu76c1hmPV7QKZESP9w7bQ7m8Y1VUgx

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Cleanup in aisle everychat

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Did FTX even list monero? .. wheres telegrambot admin when you need to mass delete stuff

<g​fdshygti53:monero.social> non

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> So this person didnt even lose any xmr

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Just 20k worth of gambling

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> (im playing devils advocate)

they posted it all over libera.chat, they just took most of large channels

including official channels

under different nicks

<j​okeman203:hackliberty.org> is using pools a bad idea?

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Define bad :D lol

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Large pools > definitely bad

<j​okeman203:hackliberty.org> ?

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> The msgs were deleted. A spammer

<j​okeman203:hackliberty.org> is it possible to mine without a pool?

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Yea

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> you can

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> solo or p2pool

<j​okeman203:hackliberty.org> are big pools a problem?

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Easy p2pool setup see: GUPAX

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Yes

<j​okeman203:hackliberty.org> are they an immediate threat to monero?

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> 69% of the top 2 pools

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> on*

<j​okeman203:hackliberty.org> is monero fucked?

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> no

<j​okeman203:hackliberty.org> why not?

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Because were not fighting back yet

<j​okeman203:hackliberty.org> ?

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Adding too much hr to any any pool (to balance it out), lowera profitability

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> So normal folks will actually stop mining and its counterproductive

<j​okeman203:hackliberty.org> ahh

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> I would like to see "good actor" pools split their pools up and limit their max hash

<j​okeman203:hackliberty.org> well the issue seems to fix itself

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> in theory

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> for redundancy :P

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> it be nice if supportxmr @ 25% "autoswitching you to our other pool, supportxmr 2"

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> At that point we'd be trusting support to actually split the pools, instead of trusting miners to not use a pool to try to 51%

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> If 30% of nanos miners move to support, support will have 50%. Support could probably limit that on their end if they wanted to

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> We need to build a better x5

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Call it "x5 pro"

<e​ndor00:matrix.org> But if the same entity controls them, it makes no difference

<e​ndor00:matrix.org> The point is that different people control different pools

<e​ndor00:matrix.org> Large pools already have a "distributed" infrastructure - can't put all that load on a single node, plus they want multiple nodes across the world to ensure low ping for all their miners