<l​ederstrumpf:matrix.org> Hey all, my friend Awa from Anoma is organizing a panel for the Shielding Summit on 10 July in Brussels (parallel to EthCC): shieldingsummit.org

<l​ederstrumpf:matrix.org> Zooko's currently on board for the panel, rest TBD.

<l​ederstrumpf:matrix.org> Does anyone directly working on full-chain membership proofs happen to be in Europe during that time and would also be keen to represent the Monero side of the discussion?

<l​ederstrumpf:matrix.org> I'm sure Monero in upcoming FCMP territory would be fun & spicy to discuss with Zooko.

<r​ottenwheel:kernal.eu> jeffro256 kayabanerve @kayabanerve:matrix.org

<k​ayabanerve:monero.social> I was already offered and declined as I leave Europe in the next few days and refuse to fly the Atlantic again a week later 😅

<k​ayabanerve:monero.social> The only other direct dev is jberman. tevador presumably knows enough they could speak on it. jeffro256 could speak on the ecosystem and effects.

<k​ayabanerve:monero.social> jberman is doing the integration to be exceptionally clear. I am the sole dev thus far of the FCMP++ libs.

<k​ayabanerve:monero.social> So "directly working on" is very strong criteria and a bit difficult to suffice

Agree would be nice to have someone speaking on Monero fcmp progression there -- I have a prior engagement unfortunately, won't be able to make this one

<a​aron:cypherstack.com> Will they allow remote participants?

<a​aron:cypherstack.com> I'm available on that day, but will not be in Europe

<j​effro256:monero.social> Same ^

<a​aron:cypherstack.com> I mean, I'd go to appear in person if it's a big deal, but that sounds expensive and lengthy

<a​aron:cypherstack.com> Cypher Stack has released its FCMP++ report: github.com/cypherstack/fcmp-review/releases/tag/final

<a​aron:cypherstack.com> The PDF is available at that release, and the repository contains the TeX source for it

<r​ucknium:monero.social> Aaron Feickert: Thank you!

<j​effro256:monero.social> Thank you

<j​effro256:monero.social> In the notation section: "Transactions consume existing outputs and generate new outputs. Output

<j​effro256:monero.social> keys are of the form O = xG+yT , where x is a signing key required to authorize

<j​effro256:monero.social> a transaction consuming the output, and y is arbitrary." This is probably overly nit-picky, but knowledge of both x *and* y need to be known to create a valid composition proof and spend an e-note, correct? I only bring this up this distinction since we plan to have outgoing view keys where a scanner can recover x, but not y. This way, they can calculate key images, but cannot spend

<a​aron:cypherstack.com> Yes, that's correct. I had intended to update that language, but simply forgot to do so. Good catch!

<a​aron:cypherstack.com> I'll update and re-issue using the same tag, so that release link will continue to work. (The change will be visible and tracked as a commit and PR for transparency)

<a​aron:cypherstack.com> It shouldn't affect any of the analysis, which accounts for this

<a​aron:cypherstack.com> Updated!

<a​aron:cypherstack.com> (kudos also to kayabanerve who pointed out the poor wording; the failure to update is my fualt)

<a​aron:cypherstack.com> ^ the misspelling of fault as fualt is also my fualt...

<r​ottenwheel:kernal.eu> Loo.

<r​ottenwheel:kernal.eu> Lol.