-
ErCiccione
-
ErCiccione
the pr is meant to give an objective guideline on what to list on the mobile and light wallets section
-
ofrnxmr[m]
ill comment further when i have time, but i feel this is the wrong direction. that is, foregoing responsibility and opening the door for random junk wallets to be listed
-
ofrnxmr[m]
the only thing on getmonero should be community vetted software, even if not endorsed
-
ofrnxmr[m]
being around for a long time doesnt make xmrwallet better thannstack, not exclude stack
-
ofrnxmr[m]
nor*
-
ofrnxmr[m]
not should itbopen the door for grifter wallets
-
ofrnxmr[m]
nor*
-
ErCiccione
"community vetted software" is way too broad. Now i think it's time to have stricter guidelines, so to have objective parameters to be listed on that section. Having no parameters ends up vetting based on the personal opinion of who is doing the vetting, which is not optimal
-
ErCiccione
we can also say that wallets will be added at discretion of the maintainers of the website, but that would make even easier to end up in a mess of complaints and "why them and not me" kind of situations
-
ErCiccione
In any case, leaving the vetting to an undefined "community" doesn't make sense now that the project is much bigger and there are many different communities
-
ofrnxmr[m]
those questions are easy to answer
-
ofrnxmr[m]
and no, oroject isnt much bigger.there are only a handful of wallets that CAN be recommended
-
ErCiccione
that's your personal opinion. My point here is to avoid personal opinions as much as possible in favour of an objective set of parameters
-
ofrnxmr[m]
and getmonero shoukd only be recommending wallets that are held accountabke
-
ofrnxmr[m]
its not my opinion
-
ofrnxmr[m]
i test wallets
-
ofrnxmr[m]
i dont take bribes
-
ErCiccione
i'm suggesting to decrease the amount of trust needed by a visitor of the website. "Trust me i test wallets" goes in the opposite direction of that. How would getmonero be able to hold wallets accountable? The maintainers cannot do more than list or remove a wallet
-
ofrnxmr[m]
how? the same way we do with all other pull requestd
-
ErCiccione
with clear parameters instead of the opinion of the active contributors in the specific moment the request to be added on getmonero is made
-
ofrnxmr[m]
things get reviewed furst. unused wallets by definition cant be listed as nobody has reviewed them
-
ofrnxmr[m]
feel free to keep listing grifter wallets
-
ofrnxmr[m]
ill keep trying to make sure they dont
-
ofrnxmr[m]
they can go get listed on poolbay.io or coingecko
-
ErCiccione
That's a centralized approach that i disagree with and that's a recipe for troubles
-
ofrnxmr[m]
go list coinwallet and elite whileyoure at it
-
ofrnxmr[m]
scammers gonna scam
-
ErCiccione
can you make non toxic comments as well?
-
ofrnxmr[m]
ttul
-
ofrnxmr[m]
and upload the og copy of the wallet generator thx
-
ErCiccione
i take it as a no
-
ofrnxmr[m]
im busy
-
ofrnxmr[m]
and youre wasting everybodies time with your refusal to upload the damn document
-
ofrnxmr[m]
turned a link change into some weirdeffort to removecredits andaddyour own
-
ofrnxmr[m]
now you want to loosenhe language around listing scam wallets
-
ofrnxmr[m]
toxic = you
-
MajesticBank
I don't understand why ofrnxmr[m] is not banned
-
MajesticBank
anyway I think we need more wallets on getmonero
-
MajesticBank
and should be better explained if wallet have closed source backend or requires centralized server required for api price ticker, basically something that's off the industry standard and have privacy implications