-
lagoon93
hello
-
apotheon
hi
-
kenshir0
hi! one question about tail emission. I understand it's required to incentivize miners without having very high fees. But what about a middle ground? the basic idea would be something like this. 99% of fees are burned. You raise fee price until as average, you burn more coins that are created (i.e.: like 1% yearly deflation)
-
kenshir0
or another example, if 0.6 xmr is created each block, you raise fees so at least, as an average, 0.7 xmr is burned per block.
-
sech1
why burn in the first place? So that number can go up?
-
kenshir0
yep
-
sech1
current fee/tail emission structure works
-
sech1
if it works, don't touch it
-
sech1
I dunno, buy Dogecoin or Shiba if you want number go up
-
kenshir0
more correctly, so value go up with time.
-
kenshir0
not number
-
kenshir0
I think it should be clear now that crypto is not going to be widely used in daily payments, especially privacy coins, as it would be very easy to avoid taxes.
-
sech1
if fees are 0.7 xmr per block, no one would use it
-
kenshir0
so very small fees are less important that long term value
-
sech1
it's like $1 per transaction
-
sech1
small fees are more important than long term value
-
sech1
xmr works equally well is it costs $1 or $1000
-
kenshir0
yep, roughly it would be 1$ per tx
-
kenshir0
if more people use monero, it could be less
-
kenshir0
the more tx, the lower fees can be
-
sech1
I don't want laser eyes and number go up people, Monero is a currency and is supposed to be used
-
sech1
so low fees
-
kenshir0
monero is not a currency, and no government will allow it. It's a cryptocurrency which allows private payments, not a currency.
-
sech1
I'd rather see XMR=$100 and accepted in every store than XMR=$10,000 and accepted only for VPN and exchanges
-
sech1
cryptocurrency is a currency
-
kenshir0
I'm sorry, but you will never see Monero accepted in stores
-
sech1
monero is cryptocurrency -> monero is currency
-
sech1
logic
-
kenshir0
neither Monero nor any other privacy coin
-
kenshir0
if are lucky they will allow BTC and others, but privacy coins, you can bet that will never happen.
-
sech1
I've already seen it accepted in stores
-
kenshir0
because lack of regulation
-
kenshir0
the taxman don't like it
-
sech1
-
kenshir0
I mean widely used. Regulations are coming.
-
kenshir0
what government would allow it?
-
kenshir0
something that allow people to easily avoid taxes?
-
sech1
what government would allow cash?
-
sech1
I mean, it can be easily used to avoid taxes
-
kenshir0
cash destruction is coming too
-
kenshir0
in some years we will not have cash
-
sech1
I can pay my buddy $100 to do home repairs and get away without paying taxes!
-
dsc_
the IRC police have been informed
-
kenshir0
that are small amounts
-
sech1
inform twitter police too while you're at it :P
-
kenshir0
seriously, no goverment is going to legally allow it
-
dsc_
i'm informing everyone!!
-
kenshir0
at this point it should be clear
-
sech1
Good thing is, Monero doesn't need permission from government
-
kenshir0
sure, from private payments, but try to do it with a (legal) shop.
-
kenshir0
monero doesn't need permission, but you need it for all other things of your business
-
kenshir0
the importance of low fees come from the possibility of people doing daily payments with Monero. But I'm sorry my friend that will never happen.
-
kenshir0
legally xD
-
dsc_
kenshir0: maybe not in your country / region
-
dsc_
I can see it happen here, where cash is still considered normal
-
kenshir0
I love this project, but I think the correct way in this matter is the Bitcoin way: security through high fees, and fast/cheap payments with a layer 2. That makes the coin gold and currency at the same time.
-
dsc_
kenshir0: btw, in EU's current inflation environment it might actually implode EUR such that people will flock to alternatives (because they are otherwise locked out of their bank accounts)
-
kenshir0
(and limited supply of course)
-
kenshir0
dsc_ yep, but the best for that is BTC I think
-
dsc_
BTC is not suitable for payments becaues it is transparent, that is a risk
-
dsc_
people will eventually prefer something that works better
-
kenshir0
yep but the most important function of crypto is as a store of value. You can always swap each month for your national currencty to make payments.
-
kenshir0
traditional money is already working fine to make payments. You only can to swap your store of value of choice for your national currency.
-
dsc_
most important function of crypto is not store of value
-
dsc_
its permission & anonymous payments
-
dsc_
permissionless*
-
kenshir0
we have that with cash too
-
kenshir0
the government always allow a form of payment
-
kenshir0
call it X
-
dsc_
traditional money does *not* work fine to make payments, if I want to send money to sech1 and he is in Russia I can first spend 20minutes on the phone with my bank about why my account is temporarily locked
-
kenshir0
what people need the most is a good store of value and not be robbed by the goverment through inflation.
-
kenshir0
for international payments, average people can use a exchange. That cleans your personal history from blockchain.
-
kenshir0
you can use coinbase or other to send any crypto to any country, and that comes from the wallet of the exchange. It's not your history.
-
dsc_
exchanges are centralized, commercial parties with KYC that report your transactions just like any bank would
-
kenshir0
but that's not my point, privacy is great, but I think Monero could be both things, store of value and private money.
-
kenshir0
dsc_ I know, but average people is not going to use personal wallets and personally manage the backup of their keys
-
kenshir0
they will use something easy
-
kenshir0
and not everyone is tech savvy
-
dsc_
they will learn it when it is the difference between having funds or not
-
kenshir0
the government will not allow it, never. You can have all the world outside the system, but when you want to use it, it has to enter the system and you are detected. There is no way.
-
dsc_
maybe your government
-
kenshir0
sorry, I mean you can have all the money, not the world xD
-
dsc_
you are from the US? or west-EU? goodluck!
-
kenshir0
most goverments, if not all, will not allow it.
-
kenshir0
yeah lol
-
dsc_
'outside the system' is overly dramatic
-
dsc_
Monero is nothing more than a digital version of physical cash
-
dsc_
thus it can be treated as such
-
dsc_
(governance wise)
-
dsc_
(or legal wise, whatever)
-
kenshir0
as outside the system, I mean outside the surveillance of the government
-
dsc_
yes I know what you mean
-
dsc_
what is the difference with physical cash?
-
dsc_
nothing
-
dsc_
gov cannot track physical cash
-
kenshir0
yep, that's why they are on their way to eliminate it
-
dsc_
physical cash is 'inside the system'
-
dsc_
right
-
dsc_
but the US is
-
dsc_
not necessarily 'the world is'
-
kenshir0
as 'the world', I mean the vast majority of developed world
-
dsc_
if I step outside right now, go to a restaurant, I have 50% chance they dont take a card
-
kenshir0
maybe in Venezuela they use it, some time, because their money doesn't work. But that's an exception.
-
dsc_
??? :P
-
kenshir0
for now, they accept cash, for now
-
kenshir0
^^
-
dsc_
for EU, some big currency related problems are coming
-
dsc_
people will start looking for alternatives
-
dsc_
if it means having food or not
-
dsc_
so 'goverment will never allow it' is nonsense
-
dsc_
developed world or not
-
kenshir0
sure, but the problem of euro is that it's losing value
-
kenshir0
you can pay with euros without problems
-
kenshir0
what people really need is a good store of value
-
kenshir0
the rest are extras
-
dsc_
europe has some bigger problems than just losing EUR valuation
-
dsc_
whole industries will most likely shutdown and 'some sort of domino effect' may ensue
-
sech1
dsc_ btw crypto is literally the only working way for me to send money to my Russian bank account
-
dsc_
right
-
Rucknium[m]
kenshir0: What people need to realize is that money is not an investment. Anyway, low tx fees have been a principle of Monero from the beginning and it is very unlikely to change. If you want to convince a privacy coin to have high fees, try elsewhere.
-
sech1
the other working way is to take cash and physically go there
-
sech1
"money is not an investment" finally someone said it
-
sech1
money is money
-
sech1
it's a value equivalent
-
sech1
at best it should have the same value as it had a year, 10 years ago
-
kenshir0
europe problems are unrelated to allow privacy coin payments on businesses.
-
sech1
but not "number go up please"
-
kenshir0
you are focusing all the time on the hope that will happen some day, but I think that's not going to happen.
-
dsc_
kenshir0: they are very related.
-
kenshir0
no easy tax-avoid mechanism will be allowed, never
-
kenshir0
and for international payments to Russia or others, that works with all crypto
-
kenshir0
and ocasional transfers allow for high fees if that gives you a good store of value properties.
-
sech1
why high fees? low fees are better
-
dsc_
< kenshir0> no easy tax-avoid mechanism will be allowed, never <== like starting a business?
-
sech1
there are a million relatively easy ways to avoid taxes
-
sech1
or I'd rather say "optimize" taxes
-
moneromooo
Like not earning anything.
-
sech1
fully legal, mind you
-
kenshir0
high fees to allow for limited supply and keep security only with fees
-
kenshir0
normal people don't know stock market, they need a good store of value
-
sech1
security only with fees? That's never been done and it won't work
-
kenshir0
crypto can be store of value and money, a creation of historical importance.
-
kenshir0
sech1 yep, there are ways to "optimize" taxes, but privacy coins allow you to not declare a cent xD
-
sech1
that doesn't mean avoid taxes
-
sech1
if you don't declare anything and go buy a house, there will be questions
-
sech1
how do you think it all worked when only cash was around?
-
kenshir0
I don't know anyone what buys a house with cash
-
kenshir0
maybe that happens, but never see it
-
kenshir0
most people pay it through bank, with small payments each month
-
kenshir0
all very controlled
-
kenshir0
if you check bitcoin, each block earns lot of money only in fees
-
sech1
I asked about "when only cash was around"
-
sech1
not about who you know _today_
-
kenshir0
so "only fees" security is perfectly possible
-
sech1
how did countries collect taxes 100 years ago?
-
sech1
"only fees" security is perfectly possible <- that requires a mathematical proof
-
sech1
so far I've only seen papers about future Bitcoin instability
-
kenshir0
sech1 but what happened 100 years ago doesn't apply because they didn't have the surveillance mechanism that we have today
-
sech1
when the last Bitcoin is mined
-
moneromooo
-
kenshir0
sech1 go to any BTC block explorer, you can see it yourself
-
kenshir0
they earn more value per block with fees, that a monero block including tail emission
-
sech1
Block explorer is not a proof
-
sech1
when the base subsidy is 0 and only fees are left, it will be highly unstable
-
kenshir0
but you can compute it today
-
sech1
most of transactions will be done on L2 and miners will get 0 from them
-
kenshir0
with today's usage, you earn lot of value, only with fees
-
sech1
"value per block with fees" not fair comparison, BTC costs 150 times more
-
kenshir0
as Satoshi said, the only problem is that BTC have little usage after last BTC is mined.
-
sech1
it will have little usage
-
kenshir0
but that only will happen if the coin is dead
-
sech1
because no one wants to pay high fees
-
sech1
everyone will move to L2
-
sech1
base layer will be left without revenue
-
sech1
hashrate will fall
-
sech1
millions of ASICs shut down, but ready to attack (for the right price)
-
sech1
don't say I didn't warn you
-
kenshir0
this would be another long debate, but switching to a modern BFT PoS like Casper (eth2) the problem disappears forever. But anyway, look today, Ethereum has very cheap layer 2, and there is lot of TX in layer 1
-
sech1
it's not a debate, it's a fact
-
sech1
capped supply and 0 emission is not stable and vulnerable in the long run
-
kenshir0
what proof do you have that it will be different with BTC that is being today with Ethereum
-
kenshir0
base layer is used anyway
-
sech1
Ethereum is not capped
-
kenshir0
ethereum have several ultra-cheap layer 2
-
kenshir0
I'm talking about the layer 2 problem you are telling
-
kenshir0
it's unrelate with coin supply
-
kenshir0
d
-
sech1
it's related to coin emission
-
sech1
which will be 0 if supply is limited
-
sech1
miners will not have guaranteed income
-
sech1
and that is a problem
-
kenshir0
what I'm trying to say is that layer 1 keeps being used
-
kenshir0
so the danger you see it's not happening
-
sech1
-
kenshir0
and the proof is that ethereum fees are ultra-high, and people keep using it
-
sech1
"keeps being used" is not "forever and ever" guarantee
-
sech1
in the long run, it will happen and I just linked you to the mathematical proof
-
kenshir0
go to an ethereum block explorer, check fees per block
-
sech1
you seem to not understand
-
kenshir0
even with several layer 2 working very fine (Polygon, Optimism)
-
kenshir0
layer 1 still is used, with high fees, which feed the miners
-
sech1
_today_ it is being used
-
sech1
10 years, 20 yers in the future, no one knows what market conditions will be, what usage will be
-
sech1
it is possible base layer transactions will be almost non-existent
-
sech1
there's no _guarantee_ of future income and stability for miners if emission is 0
-
kenshir0
that can totally prevented, with 100% security, switching to any modern BFT based Proof of Stake consensus
-
sech1
tail emission gives this mathematical guarantee
-
kenshir0
which I also propose, but that would be too much in the same conversation.
-
sech1
Proof of Stake? How much of total ETH emission was pre-mined? Something around 70%?
-
sech1
devs can literally own the network after switch to PoS
-
sech1
and keep owning it forever because of how PoS works
-
sech1
PoS = piece of shit
-
kenshir0
but here comes the best part
-
kenshir0
this is open source
-
kenshir0
community can easily fork if that happens
-
kenshir0
so whales don't do anything evil, if they know what's good for them
-
kenshir0
and if that happens, that's good news, because the massive coin destruction makes every holder richer than before
-
kenshir0
(hard fork burns the coins of attackers if they own so much)
-
kenshir0
note that using commitees, you need much more than 51% to attack the network
-
kenshir0
that's a suicide of historical proportions.
-
kenshir0
with BFT, there is absolute finality, so security is a problem of the past
-
kenshir0
we will have an example working in a few wees with Ethereum 2
-
kenshir0
(weeks)
-
kenshir0
anyway, thx for the conversation, have to go :)