-
revuoxmr
Revuo Monero. Issue 141: October 6 - 13, 2022.
revuo-xmr.com/issue-141.html
-
Torr
revuoxmr: Nice
-
makkiato[m]
revuoxmr: the onion doesn't load for me. Using the TOR browser I can get to the https site. TOR detects that there is an onion available and asks me if I want to switch to that. But they it can't load it: Firefox can’t establish a connection to the server at trocadorfyhlu27aefre5u7zri66gudtzdyelymftvr4yjwcxhfaqsid.onion.
-
makkiato[m]
*then
-
makkiato[m]
revuoxmr: sorry I realise now I meant to reply to the author(s) of the trocador service (linked in the Revuo Monero Issue 141)
-
Mochi101
MajesticExchange, I get "Deceptive site ahead" when trying to go to your site with Firefox.
-
rbrunner
Which TLD do you use? With
majesticbank.sc I don't get such a warning, with ".is" I get one - but is that even correct?
-
rbrunner
(I got that .is from a screenshot today about a possible scam regarding Cake Wallet, where people were adviced to change their remote nodes.)
-
rbrunner
majesticbank.su exists as well, and does not get me a warning either
-
Mochi101
rbrunner, the .is domain which comes up as the first search result with DDG.
-
Mochi101
The two that you provided are fine here too.
-
rbrunner
Hmm, but majesticbank.is does not even seem to exist right now?
-
Mochi101
majesticbank.is has been reported as a deceptive site. You can report a detection problem or ignore the risk and go to this unsafe site.
-
rbrunner
Yup, and if I try that, I only get an error message DNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAIN in Chrome, but no site whatsoever. What do you get?
-
rbrunner
I mean, if you try to go ahead to the site despite the warning?
-
rbrunner
(Of course ok if you *don't* want to go there ...)
-
Mochi101
I never went.
-
rbrunner
Maybe .is was once their's, they let it expire, a scammer took it for a while, but vanished now?
-
Mochi101
possibly... no idea
-
rbrunner
It is one of my little joys in life to go to such "deceptive sites" :)
-
rbrunner
More often than not they are already deleted, e.g. fishing pages
-
rbrunner
It gets confusing a bit. They also have
majesticbank.ru
-
rbrunner
So .ru, .sc, .su are ok, but .is not?
-
Mochi101
I guess
-
rbrunner
I find this "branding" of Majestic a bit confusing. Normally you concentrate everything to one domain. Maybe there are "historical" reasons for the various domains?
-
rbrunner
There definitely should be their site at that address, as this shows:
whois.domaintools.com/majesticbank.is
-
winter
Is there a way to move Monero between wallets with no transaction fee, assuming both wallet's private keys are known? (Curious if I can rotate keys while keeping all my balance, without having to pay an intermediate fee.)
-
winter
Does sweep_all incur a fee?
-
winter
Looks like it
-
winter
Maybe not?
-
merope
Sweeping involves a transaction like any other, the only difference is that it allows you to completely clear a wallet
-
winter
Is there any practical difference between sending a transaction normally for the entire balance versus sweeping?
-
winter
Er, I guess any difference at all
-
merope
The protocol allows for any fee, including 0, but you'd need a custom wallet implementation to create such a tx, and then modify your node so that it doesn't refuse to relay it due to the low fee - but other non-modified nodes would still refuse to relay it further, so you'd have to mine it yourself
-
merope
Sweeping = spending one/all inputs entirely, so that the amount you send is exactly the sum of all inputs minus the txfee
-
winter
Right, but is this any different from just sending <wallet balance - tx fee> normally, is sweeping just a shortcut to that?
-
merope
In a "normal" transaction you decide manually how much you want to spend - but since you don't know how much the fee will be, you might have some dust left in the wallet afterwards
-
merope
Yes, sweeping is just a shortcut
-
merope
Other than that, it's a regular tx
-
winter
Is the fee not decided at broadcast time by the wallet/user, merope? I don't understand your "you don't know how much the fee will be" part, then -- unless you mean since the fee is automatically determined by communicating with the node?
-
merope
The official wallets (and those who use the standard monero library) don't let you specify the exact fee amount like in other cryptos. Instead, the fee is determined dynamically, and you can select a "priority level" multiplier if you want
-
merope
And yes, the base fee is determined by the node
-
merope
(In fact, there have been some malicious public nodes who have made users spend very large amounts in fees because they didn't doublecheck)
-
merope
(More specifically: the node tells you the base fee/kb, which you then multiply by the kb of your tx and by your priority multiplier)
-
nominal_value
guys, hope i dont get kicked for this....but can anyone throw out an exchange or 2 that doesnt do KYC?
-
nominal_value
trying to get started and and lets face it, using traditional exchanges flies in the face of what XMR is meant for
-
as2333
exactly - but people dont really care
-
nominal_value
ugh, that bad, eh?
-
nioc
-
ofrnxmr[m]
For crypto to crypto ? Cex?
-
ofrnxmr[m]
Tradeogre and kucoin
-
ofrnxmr[m]
Fiat to crypto, localmonero and bisq
-
nominal_value
no, fiat to crypto
-
nominal_value
-
nominal_value
wierd, it says you can send with etransfer from your bank, but then says the above?
-
Torr
NSA is very old, indeed.
-
Torr
Was reading this article:
0x0.st/ovEU.pdf
-
Torr
It mentions Sputnik, the Soviet satellite.