<m​cneb10:envs.net> what was the rationale behind choosing a 60 block lock time for coinbase transactions?

<r​fhsdfh:nope.chat> this is basically just spam

<r​fhsdfh:nope.chat> spamming random images to fill up the chat

<r​fhsdfh:nope.chat> you are domain

<r​fhsdfh:nope.chat> is mynymbox legit or a scam site?

<r​fhsdfh:nope.chat> i don;t want to get scammed

<b​asses:matrix.org> reason I switched to Nheko

<r​fhsdfh:nope.chat> i just bought my domain name from incognet instead because i think mynymbox might be a scam

<j​ohn412:matrix.org> Hello everyone !

<r​fhsdfh:nope.chat> hello

<j​ohn412:matrix.org> Are monero Farcaster Meetings vocal ?

<n​ihilist:nowhere.moe> i used to have my servers and domains at incognet

<n​ihilist:nowhere.moe> the only complaint i have against them is that they are understaffed when it comes to tickets

<3​21bob321:monero.social> Yep

<n​ihilist:nowhere.moe> expect delays if you want some complex things done

<n​ihilist:nowhere.moe> it's very annoying

<n​ihilist:nowhere.moe> last time i wanted a dedicated server with ipv6 enabled (for invidious, to circumvent their ip blocks), for some reason they couldn't get it enabled after 1 full month

<n​ihilist:nowhere.moe> so i went elsewhere becasuu of that

<n​ihilist:nowhere.moe> so i went elsewhere becasue of that

<n​ihilist:nowhere.moe> so i went elsewhere because of that

<3​21bob321:monero.social> I think they use namecheap

<n​ihilist:nowhere.moe> yea

<r​fhsdfh:nope.chat> ok

<r​fhsdfh:nope.chat> nice

<r​fhsdfh:nope.chat> i use servers.guru for my servers but i am just buying a domain from incognet

<n​ihilist:nowhere.moe> yea for domains it should be fine

<n​ihilist:nowhere.moe> i use servers guru too for servers

<n​ihilist:nowhere.moe> no complaints so far

<n​ihilist:nowhere.moe> no complaints so far (9 months in)

<r​fhsdfh:nope.chat> how long did it take for the domain to activate for you?

<r​fhsdfh:nope.chat> when you bought a domain

<r​fhsdfh:nope.chat> because all orders are processed manually

<n​ihilist:nowhere.moe> 1 day i think

<r​fhsdfh:nope.chat> ok

<k​inghat:matrix.org> BigmenPixel: #haveno-dev:haveno.network has started a bounty for a flatpak: haveno-dex/haveno #1223

<r​eal_glitch:matrix.org> finally

is it possible to develop a monero stablecoin that is pegged to different fiat currencies

<k​ewbit:matrix.org> Monero is a stablecoin

its definitely not, price fluctuates

usdt is a stablecoin

<k​ewbit:matrix.org> Those are just fancy numbers, monero is a stablecoin.

but in all seriousness though

<s​trawberry:monero.social> Isn't that what zano does?

whats zano

how do you keep price stable?

you need scammy tactics

<s​trawberry:monero.social> It's possible to make private tokens, but as usual you'd need to rely on some company like tether to issue them and keep the real world assets

<n​eromonero1024:monero.social> zeph, anyone?

Physical cash is stable and private but inflation

Also miners might not care for it

right but if they abolish physical cash... there arent any stable anonymity/privacy coins

Especially if you compare it to my currency, Monero is very stable.

cant send physical cash over the internet

fax it

<s​nowman:tetaneutral.net> Stable is relative to the tokenomics of the issuer

would not need stable coins if idiets would just take crypto payments already

they keep using the payment system they deserve... paypal

great_taste, my issue with taking Paypal and things like it is that I just literally cannot use them :/

This is the reason I came to XMR, even though not the reason I stayed.

<n​obfg9000:matrix.org> if banks implemented like blind signatures / chaumian cash that would kick cryptocurrency's ass

<n​obfg9000:matrix.org> but they wont do that because it concedes too much power

if banks would implement anonymous bank accounts without limits it would kill crypto lmao

<b​asses:matrix.org> and kill people too

Banks used to do it

Before control freaks took over

freedom to send money doesn't kill people

nobfg9000, would that bypass sanctions though?

That would still mean two banks interacting with each other...

banks aren't the problem anyways... people are the problem because they still choose to use banks

Sometimes there is little choice, to be fair - like, a legal job requires one. Or my uni requires it for stipend.

I do my part in only using cash in my daily life at least though.

the legal firm and the uni are run by people, who choose to be submissive to banks

and by consequence, everyone who associates with them have to do the same

I cannot impact that, so I just do my part in actually using the money. Once I start working, might very well pick a job paid in cash - that is called a "gray" salary and apparently common, even if not legal).

Although... I don't know exactly, payment in cash may very well be legal, it is just usually "gray" (meaning nit properly taxed or something) regardless so there is an association.

much rebelious

I don't have rebelliousness because it is very dangerous, but I just do things my way as long as it isn't dangerous, no matter the convenience.

<h​ardhatter:monero.social> Eh not really, it’s not a guarantee that our inflationary formula with tail emission is the ideal rate of increase of the xmr supply to maintain a stable price. I was thinking DEXs that depend on burning mechanisms might help in some capacity with stabilizing the supply. But I think we’ll eventually have to create a proof of funds or maybe mining based voting mechanism to adju<clipped message>

<h​ardhatter:monero.social> st the coin creation rate to optimally stabilize it.

<h​ardhatter:monero.social> Having a market volume dependent mechanism for burning inherently in DEXs will be very useful for minimizing excess supply in a decentralized fashion

<h​ardhatter:monero.social> Will likely make a much better approximation than whatever we might be able to speculate on and worst case is a increase in valuation and temporary bottle neck on the growth rate of commerce

<h​ardhatter:monero.social> Causing devaluation from creating to many coins too quickly is probably worse than conservatively fostering a faster rate of commerce by creating somewhat less than the theoretically optimal amount for an unfettered growth in the rate of commerce

<h​ardhatter:monero.social> Causing devaluation from creating too many coins too quickly is probably worse than conservatively fostering a faster rate of commerce by creating somewhat less than the theoretically optimal amount for an unfettered growth in the rate of commerce

<h​ardhatter:monero.social> Btw I’m referencing an early conversation about a type of dex that would use burning as fees to prevent offer spamming and prevent DoS attacks