^ re AI stuff we ran some random tools onto p2pool / go-p2pool stuff. Of note it found ONE single unbounded memory allocation on user input on go-p2pool for no good reason that I totally didn't use the helper I have for bounded allocs

Then 40 other garbage ones

Some took too much time to untangle. And way more it hid from us

"The private key is shared with others" was a fun one that triggered a tool so many times

This was in the context of sharing the tx private key within p2pool for cross-verification

"User input may trigger expensive PoW check as DDoS" < yes people send P2Pool shares to each other

Fuzzing stuff found more things than anything else in the past, ran AI stuff on code before that and it ofc didn't find any of these

Just hallucinated code or vulnerabilities

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> DataHoarder: Ask HornetSecurity how they do it...

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> probably use AI aka actual indians

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Now the pruned blockchain is taking FOREVER. Around the 70% mark or sooner the entire block chain sync starts crawling.

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Multiple hardware and systems

<snifflz1:matrix.org> @robbin_da_hood:matrix.org: Yea always takes me a while too

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Does the computational algorithm take up more resources as the BC grows?

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> @snifflz1:matrix.org: The CPU % grows over time also. At 1% the sync flies and takes hardly any CPU cycles. By 70% the CPU hits around 80%.

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> It's not a hardware issue. It's not a connectivity issue. There's a bottleneck in the algorithm.

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> @robbin_da_hood:matrix.org: No

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Stupid question alert: the pruned BC has access to every transaction right? Including mine? Lol.

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> @robbin_da_hood:matrix.org: Wrong

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> @robbin_da_hood:matrix.org: Yes

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> @ofrnxmr:xmr.mx: I've tested hardware and I've tested connectivity.

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> The first 2million blocks or so have less transactions, smaller blocks, and different cryptography > <@robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Does the computational algorithm take up more resources as the BC grows?

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> Larger blocks = longer to sync them

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> RandomX uses decoy transactions?

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> yes

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> You wouldn't want to be in a hurry. Lol.

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> transparent outputs -> rangeproofs -> bulletproofs -> bullerproofs++

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> Bulletproofs reduced tx size drastically

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> But tx volume also increased

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Yeah. I saw the interview with the uni professor who added the bulletproof feature. Brilliant guy no doubt. He was sipping on a whiskey for the entire (daytime) interview. Lol.

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> There has to be a better way of syncing this BC?

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Publish the entire BC to a repo. SHA256 it, publish the checksum. Then encrypt with a public key.

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> I know this wouldn't work. Just brainstorming.

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> If I could SHA256 someone else's public node. Start from there?

<jeffro256> This is basically "fast sync" which is what the daemon already does up to the latest checkpoint. It downloads the entire contents of the blockchain, checking the contents against a checkpoint hash, but doesn't check crypto proofs until after the latest checkpoint. It works if you don't care about validating the entire tx history

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> @jeffro256: 🫡

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> So a pruned BC is just as secure as a regular BC? And it's the same size?

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> @robbin_da_hood:matrix.org: No, its about 40% the size

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> Yes its as secure as regular

<jeffro256> @robbin_da_hood:matrix.org: Fast sync in general is unrelated to pruning. Pruning means you don't keep all proof data around in the DB, Fast sync means you don't validate proofs while syncing. Fast sync is not as secure as normal sync, but a pruned node is just as "secure" (disregarding data availability for the rest of th [... too long, see mrelay.p2pool.observer/e/vISYqMkKOUM4NXg1 ]

<ofrnxmr> The main relation to pruning, is --sync-pruned-blocks requires fast-sync

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Wait. Should I be using --fast-sync ?

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> its technicallt --fast-block-sync

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> But its already enabled by default

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> @ofrnxmr:xmr.mx: It's enabled by default?

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> At this rate the pruned BC is going to take 7 days.

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> @robbin_da_hood:matrix.org: Yes

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> Are you using an hdd or n ssd?

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Ssd, that reports itself to the kernel as a hdd

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> some driver issue probably

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> Type sync_info and send the mooooo line

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> It's just one 3 line 'mooo...'

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> I'm on a different device

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> What does the line above it say

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> dmesg says "scsi 2:0:0:0 Direct-Access ANSI : 6"

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> ... PQ: 0

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> MobileDataStar 0203

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> I can't find the monero port on localhost

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> I'm running --hide-port

<ofrnxmr> @ofrnxmr:xmr.mx: .

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> I cant access the port to call sync_info

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Error: Unsuccessful -- json_rpc_request

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> When I build a curl json-rpc request I get: "empty reply from server"

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Monerod is running

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> I had the --restricted-rpc on

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> @ofrnxmr: m.oooo....

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> next_needed_pruning_seed: 4

<duckpondy:matrix.org> This is the future gramps > <@ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> "its not vibe coded and never will be"

<duckpondy:matrix.org> I hope the Monero code review process is more rigorous

<duckpondy:matrix.org> You're probably using the old models > <DataHoarder> Just hallucinated code or vulnerabilities

<duckpondy:matrix.org> Claude Sonnet 4.5 rarely hallucinates

nah it kept hallucinating stuff as well in cryptography

again, unless you have deep knowledge of the topics in question it looks fine

basically the noise to signal ratio is extremely bad, and the signals get caught by regular stuff

i hope monero doesn't accept 100% LLM code

the only good cases are when a human (who knows the topic very well) uses the LLM for assistance

and questions and corrects the LLM

however what I have found it works better is to compare a canonical implementation to a different one

rather than blindly using the code it gives out

that way it's not inventing stuff but working with context

current transformer models can distill (make less from more) very well

<duckpondy:matrix.org> If a human blindly uses the code it gives out, why have the human in the first place?

it takes more time to review that AI code than writing it firsthand :D

^

I had to tell it that "no, this is not a thing" and "yes, this is a thing" so many times, not even code related

"no this package doesn't exist in std"

also lol

I gave it a verbatim copy of the canonical code

i hate when it hallucinates

the answer already had invented parts of that code

it hallucinated a fucking environment variable

for disabling a setting in a program

then I paste "no see above, this snippet is like this" -> "Oh you are entirely right ... blah blah"

<duckpondy:matrix.org> I've found that Claude Sonnet 4.5 works really well with wallet2 and other widely documented code like React. However, when I tried it with Serai, it failed miserably > <DataHoarder> current transformer models can distill (make less from more) very well

it works with code that it knows about, ofc

but not novel stuff

sadly all writing is novel, specially around new cryptography :)

or very obscure stuff

it took a session a couple of hours of back and forth

to find that a 100 line snippet

had a line where 1 -> i

as a typo

which was instantly identified on classical methods (and fuzzing)

i never used a LLM for code

i found that in my project, it's annoying because it knows nothing

and 100% hallucinates every detail to please me

<duckpondy:matrix.org> What model are you using?

I throw stuff to review or find typos. Like, make less from more, or have a second something to call be insane (I am usually enough around that)

duckpondy: GPT 4o, claude, llama

any model i could use

I have tried across most targets, also I have a local cluster for this

sadly it doesn't have that much VRAM, just ~250 GiB

<duckpondy:matrix.org> I'm surprised it hallucinates that much...

so it can't run that large of models. but at least I can finetune some context onto it

it doesn't know shit it hasn't been trained with

no surprise

and I keep working with novel things

duckpondy: my project is about a 40 year old RTOS

that is barely documented online

that said. in RE, "make sense of this assembly" has saved me many hours

identifies some specific algorithm or parts of it, while I do everything by hand

DataHoarder: have you used AI assistance plugins in ghidra?

again, the case of not knowing enough about the field to know how bad it actually is

no, Cindy_

I'm having it now connect to local cluster soon (tm)

local cluster is like weeks old

<duckpondy:matrix.org> I'm curious about the ongoing electricity costs of running AI models locally, once you've already bought the necessary hardware. Are those costs as high as mining 24/7? > <DataHoarder> sadly it doesn't have that much VRAM, just ~250 GiB

well it's not running 24/7 :)

the server fans cost more tbh

250GB is insane

I just ... found a deal Cindy_

a very good deal

called enterprise GPU pricing error

<duckpondy:matrix.org> With 250GB VRAM the bottleneck becomes RAM

yeah, and that it's split across many GPUs

so PCIe

you have 62x more RAM than i have

no GPU interconnects

<duckpondy:matrix.org> 250GB VRAM is more than enough for the high end local models

that's VRAM not RAM Cindy_!

yeah, and you can quantize a bit if desired

oh yeah VRAM

that said this thing usecase is not GPU specifically but mostly general compute/VMs

and I wanted some of these gpus for vGPU stuff

but alas I can spawn jobs for it

it'd be replacing 2-3 2U servers :D

see curl author blog about the levels of AI review shit they have to deal with anyhow

or recent talk (it's on yt)

<duckpondy:matrix.org> It's not only curl

example.

bug bounties fucking suck nowadays

<duckpondy:matrix.org> Serai deals with it 😭

or some AI using 12 TiB of bandwidth to "clone" a 100 KiB git repo

when people are given a reward for finding bugs

if AI is so smart can't it just git clone even regularly

there are people who are also incentivized to try to cheat

instead of fetching every commit page then blame every line then do that for the next one

when blocked they find new ways or extract the specific .bundle links

it's so inneficient for both sides

git clone gives you all instantly AND it's fast, not rate limited

DataHoarder: too lazy

their scraper probably only extracts HTML

so they just don't bother

nope

those are the dumb ones

that get blocked

these are git fetchers

they have awareness of commits

archive/bundle links

that were never exposed but know they exist on site

via the client api

they discover commits via random links then try to fetch via bundles

instead of again, git clone :D

<duckpondy:matrix.org> I noticed an interesting observation. I rarely encounter people who have a truly knowledgeable perspective on LLMs. Most are either overly critical or caught up in the hype. Does anyone know where to find genuine experts in this field? For instance, where are the original authors of the "Attention Is All You Need" paper these [... too long, see mrelay.p2pool.observer/e/nOLosskKSUp3MTF2 ]

there's the old saying that "to err is human"

but you just need a machine to make it automated :D

who's responsible for bad crypto code

AI has been very uplifting for me

it has shown me that i could be like

extremely fucking dumb, and i could get a very good tech job

as long as i don't ask for wages

I do love some good old RRN :)

it keeps consistent in long context!

i could delete all the source code

I used to train some in some dual 980's I think

write a bunch of mess

and i'd still have a voluntary job

then you bring the expert emergency to untangle the mess

i feel like that kid banging on the keyboard from that windows ME commercial

at $work I already had to discover then warn then report to authorities actual reportable issues

every time it was caused by AI misuse, or AI usage, hallucinations

handling important data, leaking admin API credentials EVERYWHERE

but it's FREE LABOR

reviewing that code was useless so it was thrown away in the end

who cares if the AI destroys everything within

it's free labor

waste of time, money, and leaks everywhere

so more money

<duckpondy:matrix.org> Does your workplace use proprietary models?

enjoy triggering GDPR and PCI DSS at the same time

DataHoarder: this is what happens when you hire business grads instead of senior engineers or people who know wtf they're talking about as the CEO

they are one of the players who are making the big models, so yes

we actually have a wide ban on AI usage on code projects as they are very aware of the danger, and nothing in creative work

<duckpondy:matrix.org> @duckpondy:matrix.org: If anyone knows where I can find real information on AI, please let me know. When I research something like Monero, I can access the source code, read research papers, and so on. The same applies to most other software I use, but AI is different. Even the so-called "open source" models are quite clos [... too long, see mrelay.p2pool.observer/e/8JqGs8kKNVFqNHll ]

it's allowed on productivity stuff, emails, documents

<duckpondy:matrix.org> I've also been to conferences, but they've been very disappointing. They're just filled with pseudo-researchers looking for funding or tech bros trying to advertise a wrapper for ChatGPT or Claude

AI is different because research has become more closed off

because profits

remember when OpenAI used to publish whitepapers?

<duckpondy:matrix.org> I do

<duckpondy:matrix.org> I miss that and now like you said it seems so fraudulent and profit-driven

s/seems//

everyone wants to be the BETTER AI

instead of working together

<duckpondy:matrix.org> > we actually have a wide ban on AI usage on code projects as they are very aware of the danger, and nothing in creative work

<duckpondy:matrix.org> Wow! Someone I know who works at Coinbase says they're implementing mandatory AI KPI requirements. Apparently, if you don't use the AI tools, you could be fired. It makes no sense, given that Coinbase is a serious business managing billions in funds and hallucinations would be disastrous

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> 😀 > <Cindy_> and questions and corrects the LLM

duckpondy: why force people to use the AI

100% that rule was made by some MBA dumbass who wants to say "our business uses AI all the time!"

so they can get more investors

<duckpondy:matrix.org> Ask Brian Armstrong (CEO of Coinbase)

@duckpondy:matrix.org yeah they wasted money and now it comes from above. but our "dept" has more power than that, anyhow

similar from above, but specifically they pushed for code initially and now they are still dealing with the consequences of that

when every AI usage ends up with an incident they stop enforcing that qiuck lol

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> This is not my experience of CoPilot code. Anything vague though in terms of statements will lead to th AI deleting whole modules of critical & working code. Lol. > <DataHoarder> it takes more time to review that AI code than writing it firsthand :D

<duckpondy:matrix.org> At Coinbase they enforce Copilot and Cursor

they suck

microsoft is literally paying youtubers and "social media influencers" to shill copilot

anyhow I just see the shitshows from a company that should be a leader in this and know about it

because windows is becoming an "agentic OS"

and if it's that bad inside, imagine how bad it is for companies that just "adopt" it without knowing internals lol

<duckpondy:matrix.org> Windows is losing so many users

so, local stuff for me, make less from more, and review tasks. but I write the code, I make the decisions and I'm the accountable one

microsoft is becoming out of touch with what the users want

of course they're losing users

Cindy_: but what about the investors?

users don't put pressure investors do

true

<duckpondy:matrix.org> I've noticed a massive uptick in the Linux subreddits I browse, also Steam releasing their SteamOS machine, and Apple not buying into this nonsense. I don't know what Windows is doing

Wine is getting better and better everyday

<duckpondy:matrix.org> Is this Clippy the sequel?

<duckpondy:matrix.org> Cortana the trilogy?

more like Bonzi Buddy

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> I highly doubt it. How many 'tokens' would you be using? For how much time? Mining is superintensive in terms of electricity/ cpu / gpu i reckon. Writing code with a local llm? > <@duckpondy:matrix.org> I'm curious about the ongoing electricity costs of running AI models locally, once you've already bought the necessary hardware. Are those costs as high as mining 24/7?

at least bonzi buddy and clippy tried to be useful

or fun

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> I don't understand why anyone still uses M$ > <Cindy_> microsoft is becoming out of touch with what the users want

when Wine achieves close to 100% compatibility with windows programs

Windows will be dead

except for very niche usecases

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Meh > <Cindy_> microsoft is literally paying youtubers and "social media influencers" to shill copilot

<duckpondy:matrix.org> @robbin_da_hood:matrix.org: I don't see much point in running LLMs locally unless you have the hardware for beefier models. IMO the main use case for local generation seems to be image and video, which is also much more resource-intensive, but I'm unsure of the costs

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Cindy_: Won't M$ just muddy the waters?

muddy the waters?

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Cindy_: Can't they add (or change) libs, protocols, stacks or whatever. To send Wine back to Y0? Dont they have a master key they only give out to major software vendors? I don't know anything about Wine...

Wine reimplements the APIs and DLLs

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> Is it a reverse engineering project?

yes

they reverse engineer Win32 (and other Windows related API) functions

cleanroom engineering afaik

<duckpondy:matrix.org> @robbin_da_hood:matrix.org: If SteamOS becomes popular, it will also result in Microsoft losing their PC gaming market share

they can't break Wine, unless they fuck up their whole API (which will also break compatibility with their own programs)

or add some undocumented API functions and abuse them in their own program

(which is temporary)

<duckpondy:matrix.org> I noticed this is #monero:monero.social

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> hmmm

<duckpondy:matrix.org> Not #monero-offtopic:monero.social mods please don't kill us

mods are asleep

like most of the time, i doubt they care

last days this felt like offtopic

<duckpondy:matrix.org> DataHoarder Do you know if any Monero contributors rely on LLMs?

<duckpondy:matrix.org> I trust their opinion on this issue more than any CEO or random shill

I found that LLMs can be used for code reviews, but not much better than classical static analysis. And you need to know the code already to make sense of what LLMs tell you and filter out garbage

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> sech1: If used properly, almost are quite handy at code development IMHO.

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> I would disagree with the argument that you are better off writing code yourself. Except under special circumstances. The amnesic window being one.

<robbin_da_hood:matrix.org> It has lots of issues with API versions. It'll mix code from multiple versions. Or add random code. If the api was recently updated, you'll have issues.

writing glue code is different from writing novel or new libraries

a fun one for "glue" code is this clocks.brianmoore.com

> Every minute, a new clock is displayed that has been generated by nine different AI models. Each model is allowed 2000 tokens to generate its clock. Here is its prompt

DataHoarder: wow are these clocks terrible

deepseek did a very good job though

Cindy_: it changes every minute

damn

a question btw, can p2pool have subpools?

i mean a p2pool instance

or atleast multiple addresses, that can be selected to mine at stratum layer

<gan:skhron.org> You can run a separate network from the main ones

i meant pools of hashrate dedicated to one address (but in the same p2pool instance) that can be selected by the miner

also running in the same sidechain

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> Yes > <Cindy_> a question btw, can p2pool have subpools?

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> Cindy_: Dont think so

really?

<ofrnxmr> You can run pools on top of p2pool, and there are pools that run on top of p2pool.

<ofrnxmr> i don't think you can split payout directly from p2pool. Foggy, but i think this was inquired about a couple days ago cc @datahoarder

ofrnxmr, i meant pools on top of p2pool for designated addresses

like stratum user abc123 = address 4AbcauDh...

the point is to consolidate hashrate for one address into one pool

instead of many p2pool instances for one address

Cindy_: you can do this on your own

go-p2pool supports this btw

--user 4AbcauDh...

And that mines to that

Supports multiple clients each on their ow or same address

As in, via stratum

i can't host 1000 go-p2pool

You only need one

It allows multiple xmrig each specifying a different addr

Like you set --user on xmrig

Not go-p2pool

can i ask you a question

I'm working on a v5 with quite many improvements anyhow, developed during FCMP stressnt

what's the difference between 500 miners to a p2pool-backed pool vs. 500 miners hosting their own p2pool mining to the pool's address

First case they need to trust the operator of the stratum

Second case it's trustless

As they do all verification locally

what about shares and hashrate

Not even p2pool backed pool but say, someone running p2pool

Hashrate is hashrate why do you mean

You mean a centralized pool using p2pool as hashrate backend?

yes

Or a transparent pool that passes addr to p2pool shares

both cases

If it's a centralized pool it's a centralized pool

Miners never mine to their own addr

But to the pool addr

i meant does it affect the share rate

It being p2pool or solo mining is nothing

Why would it

(rate of which the pool gets their share)

Hashrate is hashrate

Doesn't matter if it's 100 miners at 1KH/s or 1 at 100 KH/s

hm

DataHoarder: can i PM?

Nah it'll get lost

What are you trying to solve

DataHoarder: i thought of making a p2pool multiplexer

where addresses are registered (by the admin) but users can mine by selecting a pool by its ID in the xmrig config

That's the raffle lol

You just want a custom proxy layer for stratum that converts user to addr

Then go-p2pool below can handle all the users

But again, they have to trust you are first not mining elsewhere and that you aren't doing shitty stuff

selecting an address by its ID*

like setting user: "bob123"

Why not just let them choose the address directly

make the proxy layer choose the address associated with bob123

Then it's go-p2pool below

Like you have the single p2pool multiple addr part done

DataHoarder: recording how much hashrate going to a user

like a power meter

Then you are just a centralized pool

You can also use a transparent proxy

That records hashrate

how can that be set up?

Implement again the stratum layer

You also want to offer lower difficulty to measure rates

implementing the stratum layer to what pool?

DataHoarder: i wanted to like make it a option to donate hashrate

for a cause

but i wonder if i could really do this transparently (regardless if i was hosting p2pool or not)

Like you can already do so by just exposing go-p2pool stratum

People can mine to their address or someone else's

You can have a transparent stratum proxy in front with any extra logic you want

Like convert user -> addr

Or serve lower difficulty tasks so you get more xmrig shares reported

DataHoarder: does p2pool expose any way of estimating the hashrate of another address

<rbrunner7> Alright, @robbin_da_hood:matrix.org , the proof is in the working, reviewed and accepted PR, right? You have dozens and dozens of issues to choose from and solve with the help of those LLMs, where you should not have to code the solutions for those issues yourself, because hopefully they don't fall under "special circumstances": github.com/monero-project/monero/issues

You can see how many shares they have based on PPLNS

Like it's what observer does

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> @rbrunner7: Look at the damn prs from today

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> 10219 on monero

<ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> 4536 4528 4529 4530 on gui

i closed these. don't have permission to block the user

tobtoht_: maybe setup a bot to auto-close PRs they make

ofrnxmr: isn't it a coincidence that most of these PRs are bounty-related?

what nonsense PR lol

also lol, bold for 10219 to add a comment crediting themselves. have they not heard of git blame?

nonsensical syntax wise, the comment "fixed by xx"

this code is so shit that if i wrote it, i'd be too embarrased to put my name on it

you can tell no care went into the code

they only cared about the money, they even plastered their "donation address" on the PR description

<rbrunner7> Wow, 10219 is cool.

did they even compile it

skip_sync isn't even defined in the code

this would never compile

<rbrunner7> GitHub compiles it for you. GUI commit 4527 doesn't compile.

also wtf is issue 4259

i tried looking at the ID in the monero repo

it's a pull request related to keccak API

rbrunner7: but couldn't they have bothered to compile it first locally before pushing and making a PR?

really shows the level of care that went into it

<rbrunner7> Depends on the goal :) Maybe they just see this as a joke.

he doesn't even follow indentation, and pastes "fixed by xxx" all over the place

treating the code as a wall to graffiti on

20:55:55 <Cindy_> also wtf is issue 4259

on gui repo

zcash/zcash #7068 lol

"add QR scanner"

<rbrunner7> To open such nonsensical and small PRs isn't possible only now, with the help of LLMs. Already 10 years ago it would have been easy to submit something like 10219. Doesn't look special to me, or new, frankly.

code is literally the EXACT SAME THING as the other PRs

Debug print "sync optimised" , thank you for donations!!

// Fixed by me, please don't remove this comment

tobtoht_: XMR donation address in a zcash PR

bold move

<rbrunner7> Indeed, lol

also he defines skipSync in the code

for no reason other than "Add skip sync feature for bounty Zcash"

did this guy really make a zcash PR for a monero GUI-related issue/bounty

instructions unclear: accidentally solved the bounty for zcash instead

but please give me the bounty anyway

<rbrunner7> It wasn't a "he", it was the LLM itself, roaming the Internet in an "agentic" way and looking for bounties to pay the electricity bill.

holy shit

the zcash PR actually changes nothing

other than the indentation

and the random skipSync variable that is unused

rbrunner7: or perhaps to fund the paperclip-making business

<321bob321> @rbrunner7: sentient being

rbrunner7: roaming agentically

new writing adjectives