already port forwarded to the correct address, I guess it just need to finish syncing before I can say there is a problem. Thanks for the reply

.p btc

Bitcoin ==> [Price] 65895$ , [HIGH24H] 68309$ , [LOW24H] 65243$ , [%24h] -2.26% , [%7d] 3.25% , [%30d] -30.83%

.p eth

Ethereum ==> [Price] 1932.14$ , [HIGH24H] 1996.65$ , [LOW24H] 1902.17$ , [%24h] -1.20% , [%7d] 3.03% , [%30d] -41.80%

.p xmr

Monero ==> [Price] 333.42$ , [HIGH24H] 352.98$ , [LOW24H] 324.64$ , [%24h] -4.40% , [%7d] 14.07% , [%30d] -51.10%

oh this is #monero

<imprevisto:matrix.org> that would be good in monero markets channel

<milas900:matrix.org> I see some ideas like RPC as a service and something like decentralized Rpc ?

<lancans:matrix.org> apparently disroot admins can check your emails if for whatever reason have suspicion on you > <Cindy> check out disroot :P

<maxlpm:tchncs.de> @lancans:matrix.org: True, as can literally every other email provider if you don't encrypt your emails yourself

Isn't that something universal for ANY email provider?

Also, suspicion for what? That you're a bot or using it as a burner?

<ufo808:matrix.org> mrelay.p2pool.observer/m/matrix.org/mTPjnpgerKFVuRcCFIcMSATS.png (image.png)

lancans: they can (along with any other email provider), but in reality, they're unlikely to do it

also that's why disroot admins encourage you to delete all e-mails you receive after you download them to your computer

BlueyHealer: most likely just ToS violations in general

And is the ToS sensible?

you can read it yourself

BlueyHealer: disroot.org/tos

always assume that the e-mail provider can read your emails

and anyone who says they don't/can't are likely to be more suspicious

but we keep everything in ram and live forensics does not exist

<shitpost:monero.coffee> even encrypted email providers could be storing a copy of all of your emails honeypot style, email wasn't made to be secure

Store or disable the encryption in general

use client-side encryption

like PGP

don't trust the email providers to safeguard your emails for you

👍 👍 👍

at least disroot lets you use client-side encryption..... unlike proton mail

the "trust me bro" encryption

trust us we won't report you to the feds (protonmail)

i don't even think they do client-side encryption anymore in their official client

which you are forced to use unless you fork over money to use their "bridge"

what a dumb service

and more suspicious than gmail

just use disroot or riseup with PGP :-)

"we at proton mail are so secure, that we aren't gonna let you use your own encryption. because how are we going to read your emails if you're gonna do it yourself?"

disroot sounds better lol

<ddott:matrix.org> hello

<shortwavesurfer2009> Hey, in Jeffro's #Monerotopia talk he mentioned that the wallet outputs will have nonces such as 0/1, payment/change, peanutbutter/jelly as examples.

<shortwavesurfer2009> He said this was to prevent a burning bug, otherwise the key image would be the same if you had two transactions, and you could only spend one of them.

<shortwavesurfer2009> I sent a tip and asked if different wallets implemented different nonces if that would make the transactions identifiable.[... more lines follow, see mrelay.p2pool.observer/e/rsCLjuYKVzgtVnVi ]

<hbs:matrix.org> @jeffro256:monero.social: also interestingly mentioned that OVKs could be created on a per address basis if using another key hierarchy, why hasn't this design been retained? Are there any drawbacks to it compared with the 5 keys hierarchy?

<hbs:matrix.org> On another topic, the similarity between the current IVK + KIs and the new OVK has a fundamental difference, if you are constrained to provide KIs after a given date, the previous spent outputs of your wallet remain unknown. A court would need to have different motives to request all KIs vs KIs after a given date, so similarity is only total if you are required to provide ALL KIs.

<hooftly:matrix.org> why wouldnt a court just ask for your private key/wallet password at that point?

<hbs:matrix.org> @hooftly:matrix.org: Because it violates your right to private property, so the legal basis for requesting it would be different

<hooftly:matrix.org> In what situation is a court requesting KIs where they cant request a pk? At that point there is a reason you are in court? What is a realistic scenario where one can be asked for and not the other?

<hbs:matrix.org> @hooftly:matrix.org: Many scenarios, courts can't just ask what they want in a state of law

<hbs:matrix.org> @hbs:matrix.org: Requesting an OVK could also go against article 17 of GDPR

<intr:unredacted.org> mrelay.p2pool.observer/m/unredacted.org/pqzwYajZuDLTcTGQCrNvybfP.png (91907f7df42d29bccdd17205472fa22a.png)

<kiersten5821:matrix.org> rip roman