KYC Racism

They arrested him for cashing a check while black

All on tape that shit is crazy. I’m glad we are building a world where gatekeepers don’t get to discriminate us

I need some help with regards to change getmonero.org/resources/moneropedia/change.html. My understanding is that every deposit is made from a previous input, which is then divided into output, miner fee and change. Can any explain the technical reason for this?

s/I need some help with regards to change getmonero.org/resources/moneropedia/change.html. My understanding is that every deposit is made from a previous input, which is then divided into output, miner fee and change. Can any explain the technical reason for this?/I need some help with regards to change getmonero.org/resources/moneropedia/change.html. My understanding is that every 'output' is made

from a previous input, which is then divided into the actual output, miner fee and change. Can any explain the technical reason for this?/

monero-guides[m]: What part specifically do you not understand properly? Then I can try to explain

<dEBRUYNE> "monero-guides: What part..." <- thanks for the reply. I think the problem was partly with the wording of that moneropedia entry. my understanding now - 'you use a combination of 'owned outputs' as inputs for a new tx; the sum of which will likely not equal the output + miner fee hence change is generated. And according to to the foot note since v12, change is still generated as a 0 amount regardless' (footnotes

of zero to monero). In the moneropedia entry, the term 'input' is used in place of 'owned output'. At this point I think it would better for me to try and understand the mathematics and read the literature in its entirety, however I would certainly appreciate some pointers as to why this all occurs.

monero-guides: Monero still uses the UTXO (Unspent Transaction Output) model that bitcoin uses. It may be a good idea to first fully understand that model, by looking at the educational resources on bitcoin, and then move onto Monero, which added additional features to the UTXO model.

(To be clear, Monero's codebase itself is completely independent of bitcoin. It did not start as a software fork of bitcoin. But some of the same features of bitcoin were used in Monero.)

nice, will do!

The input and output terms are unfortunate in that they seem generic, but they refer to a very specific thing in the UTXO model. And an output becomes an input when it is spent. Someone moving from one country to another is both immigrating and emigrating.

Monero is maybe more of a transaction output model as opposed to *unspent* transaction output model

True. Because one never knows if an output has been truly spent.

ETH<>XMR Atomic Swap CCS proposal by elizabeth :

What happened to the bounty?

bounty is complete

this is taking it to the next level

Oh i see

I don't know all that much about how eth scaling works but could you launch the swap contract on polygon/L2?

add comments to the ccs :)

it's the place for discussion- others may have similar q's