my hr doesn't seem as great as when i was pre v1.2

How much of a difference? Mine is at least as good

Did you try turning the comp off and on again?

Actually helped me a small amount after updating

<gingeropolous> "my hr doesn't seem as great as..." <- Same

what is comp

I have simlar issue

<mightysnowman[m]> "what is comp" <- computer

oh okay

why noone says pc instead, shorter

cause its not always a personal computer, I suppose a server or mining rig wouldnt fall under that category

otherwise youre right

hyc: that turris omnia is way overkill damn

I wonder if its the time to actually get 1GbE software NAT on arm

also yeah both qualcomm and mediatek's next gen WiSoCs will have arm64 on them

their current wisocs are ipq4019 (4x 717MHz A7) and mt7621a, 2c/4t mips

I've got 1 Gbit fibre connected to my house. can't imagine it will upgrade to 2.5Gbit any time soon though. so yeah my current 1Gbit turris omnia router is good enough

I remember the day when I first got 512kbit cable, thinking I'd never need anything more than this, I was able to listen to mp3's as they downloaded...

I remember 56k modems advertising video conferencing support. wtf, video at 56k?

hm. I had no payouts since Oct 11. just got 2 today tho.

I'd have expected you to have more hashrate hyc... got to be some old tech laying around you can set away mining

I'm getting around 0.15XMR per month at the moment

i took a couple tvboxes offline cause I was investigating firmware upgrades

I wish I could rely on the idea of purchasing another similar rig would mean I'd double my monthly income mining, but heh most likely not the case

I'm considering guying a new macbook pro and selling my current one

s/guying/buying

curious to see if the new chips have as many errors as the old one

hyc: issue currently is gigabit sw nat

hwnat no issues, lots of openwrt-able devices can do that

software nat perf sucks on most arm/mips socs, so you really cant do gigabit sqm

yeah. I see a lot of discussion of that

probably not relevant to majority of SOHO users

I think the theres some chinese soc integrators that did it, but sw nat performance still only like 600 Mbit

tried to do it*

my fibre service is pppoe, never see pppd eating any CPU

i think this one is the fastest you can get currently with arm

4 core Rockchip SOC (RK3328)

>SQM enabled ingress up to 465 Mbps, egress up to 750 Mbps

I also heard last time that theres some push to port OPNSense to these devices

that pfsense fork

so there's crypto that's PoW, crypto thats PoS, crypto thats mined by having lots of HDD space, is there a crypto that is mined with bandwidth yet? :P

probably ;)

hmm. proof of bandwidth - sending tons of traffic, making the network unusable for anyone else. sounds lovely.

aka DDoS

Hey all, are there any known issues with 1.2?

that turris omnia 2022 though, i wonder about that 16GB ram option

Distributed Mining Service more like :)

like why 16GB

why not 16GB? it would make a great home server

well yeah

RAM for fileserver caching, etc

seeing that you can lxc/docker on these too

thats a nice reason for it

maybe im just salty that my router only has 512MB :p

I've got a pair of 4TB SSDs in my rockpro64 being served over NFS

would do something similar with that router

though the only extra thing i run on it is bw monitoring and unbound in recursive mode

oh, like as a NAS? you dont need 16GB for it, but yeah if you want to run monerod and maybe other things, it would be handy

yep

i currently run this on mine

and yeah, could leave 2 cpu cores mining

what box is that?

R619AC

G-DOCK 2.0

hyc ^^

a lot of empty space in that case

yup

a lot of room for modding

free mini pcie slot

fucked up the bootloader on my first try

my turris omnia came with two upper shells for the case, one competely enclosed and one with slots exposed

hyc: this is something though

funny how the cpu responds to overclocking, it scales so well

though yeah this is traffic from eth to internal cpu as iperf server is running on the router itself

> <sudo_ki[m]> Hey all, are there any known issues with 1.2?

not that I know of

haven't seen any issues here either. just stopped running 1.1, started 1.2, went on same as before

in fact, 1.2 fixes a few issues on 1.1 :)

I must just be unlucky in that case, thanks for the replies :)

luck is a hard thing to come by ;)

After completely syncing the monero blockchain yesterday I'm having trouble connecting to the monero daemon after I reboot the ubuntu server 20.04 in which the monerod and the p2pool binaries are running. If I run the monerod status command a error messaging saying that I cannot connect to the daemon at 127.0.0.1:18081 appears. Can anyone help? Above I attached my monerod log file.

is monerod running?

<selsta> "is monerod running?" <- Apparently yes I have check with htop.

is it in restricted mode?

ok no, status should work in restricted no

I am running the monerod as a systemctl service.

try stopping it and then start monerod from command line

to see if any errors show up

Are you sure port 18081 is the RPC port in your config?

Also check you use ZMQ, otherwise might be an issue with firewall/user separation

Looks like you have unrestricted at `127.0.0.1:18081` and restricted at `0.0.0.0:18089`

sethsimmons: Yes I have follow your guide and use the suggested configuration files. Anyway congrats for you job!

<shadowfax-87[m]> "Yes I have follow your guide and..." <- Does `curl 127.0.0.1:18089/get_info` and/or `curl 127.0.0.1:18081/get_info` work?

sethsimmons: One minute I will try it.

sethsimmons: The second one works. The one at port 18081.

I have tryed to start monerod directly from the command line, same error couldnt connect to daemon 127.0.0.1:18081

Sounds like a jail or firewall issue, but that's odd as it's localhost. Can you share your systemd script?

sethsimmons: file monerod.service attached above.

And your conf? Can also just copy-paste and use markdown to turn it into a codeblock with ``` before and after the code on newlines.

echo "Like this!"

* ```bash... (full message at libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/do…56027a28cbdc87676e5364c44eeac7e9499)

* ```bash

echo "Like this!"

```

Remove `confirm-external-bind=1` and restart, see if that corrects the issue. You shouldn't need to have that line, I'll check my guide and see about updating it.

Didn't work, and another error message "Problem fetching info-- rpc_request"

But again I have run the daemon from the command line without the pid-file and the detach argument the daemon have started but after a while it was killed.

have you tried --non-interactive ?

<jaska087> "have you tried --non-interactive..." <- Same issue. The daemon starts ok but it is killed after a while.

When I checked if the daemon is running with the systemctl status monerod the following warning shows up:

ConfigurationDirectory 'monero' already exists but the mode is different. (File system: 755 ConfigurationDirectoryMode: 710)

Seth For Privacy: i wonder if adding some kind of healthcheck to the p2pool container would be useful... i haven't dug into it much, but it's definitely a bit finicky and requires an occasional reboot

s/container/image/

probably has something to do with starting before/at the same time as monerod

are they both in the same container? can't you put a sleep/delay in before starting p2pool?

yeah sleep would be fine as well

if you want to be really clever you could write a shell script to query monero rpc in a loop and wait for the status to come back "synchronized"

i like that idea a lot

See my Docker-compose setup crypto_grampy[m]

it already does that

hyc github.com/SChernykh/p2pool/blob/master/src/p2pool.cpp#L699

aha, cool

as long as RPC port is up, p2pool will take care of it

it only fails if it really starts before monerod

*before RPC port is connectable

in that case a short sleep after launching monerod should be sufficient

hyc this change fixes startup when monerod is not available: SChernykh/p2pool 966b499

it shut down because of ZMQ, now it will keep trying

hm, what's this m_finished.load() condition that breaks it out of the loop?

it's when you run "exit" command

cool

m_finished is an atomic bool

load() just reads its value

tfw my pipes freeze because p2pool didn't restart correctly

if !p2pool, run cinebench

crypto_grampy[m]: in my case input xmrig-proxy in front, in case no jobs come from p2pool it falls to another instance elsewhere

if that fails too, it does pool

i like that

Grmbl. Why has xmrig become so annoying ? It used to work with TF without any patch, now it needs lots of fixes to work because it assumes a lot more stuff -_-

TF?

townforge

ah right

<crypto_grampy[m]> "Seth For Privacy: i wonder if..." <- Yeah I need to do similar to DataHoarder, just haven't had time lately 😥

It does need a healthcheck, but sounds like the coming changes should remedy the common failure when starting p2pool and monerod at the same time.

Anyone is welcome to PR a health check 😅