plowsof, in fact it was not fork_version property that made it works, just restarting monero-lws changed get_unspent_outs response with spend_key_images and it was not there before, do you know why I have to restart it to make it work?

<ofrnxmr> Cc @vtnerd:monero.social

<vtnerd> johny_: I thought you previously said you were using openmonero? Did you switch?

vtnerd yes I am trying monero-lws now

vtnerd right now I went back to your commit from last July the 24th to see if it was working better, I am wondering if this thing has ever worked

nop it does work better with ecf3067, I am giving up for the moment

vtnerd I wanted to know why I have to restart monero-lws to get spend_key_images property from get_unspent_outs response for the new tx, I don't understand why you are asking me if I did switch :-/

<vtnerd> The spend_key_images are possible spends. They are not the images being spent in that tx, rather they are the potential spends from future txes

<vtnerd> Your new tx has an empty list because that particular output was never used in a ring signature, and therefore could not be spent

vtnerd I am not sure spend_key_images is the source of my issue but I have noticed after restarting, this property was there for outputs and it was not there before restarting

vtnerd I cannot spend my funds using mymonero-web-js if I don't restart monero-lws, that's my issue

<vtnerd> If you aren't using --daemon-sub then lws polls for new blocks. This will cause a delay in showing results. Restarting simply refetches newest blocks everytime

vtnerd ok thank you I am going to try that

vtnerd I just made a try with daemon sub but it was not working better, btw it is --sub and not --daemon-sub?

but also doesnt believe privacy exsists as devices are born compromised <- Was there ever evidence proprietary architectures by themselves were a *passive* surveillance danger? Like, I get the issues, but it's weird to claim that outright "privacy doesn't exist".

<stormyyy:stormyyy.xyz> meownero

<vtnerd> It probably is just --sub , make sure to use the pub side on the daemon

<prime:heyadora.com> What the hell is this post owo reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/1ax5xq…een_mentioned_here_before_but_it_is

<fungible.:matrix.org> @diego:cypherstack.com: is your stackwallet more trusted than cakewallet nowadays? last time (few years ago) you released some binaries as some alpha version type thing in those channels, tried it very briefly and at the time had to let you know that i had to change my firewall rules to allow out (cause "default deny outgoing") so it could connect to somewhere, just to launch the wallet

<fungible.:matrix.org> like, couldnt generate a wallet without it having to connect to the internet, did you fix that since?

<fungible.:matrix.org> like at this point i dont even know what to shill lmao

<fungible.:matrix.org> was able to shill the CLI to monero community, that was fine

<fungible.:matrix.org> but to the broader communities, cake been easier to shill, good UX and shits type thing...

mobile wallets are safe depending on your device

if you use it on a chinese no-name phone, you deserve to be hacked

like honestly pick a secure device

also ofrnxmr, thanks for the key images API

<fungible.:matrix.org> Cindy: Cindy_ @Syndi or whatever that other spelling @fbfa3bd15e surprised confirmed fed that shills IRC is still around, no wonder u out here saying phones are secure smh

call me by my nickserv username if you can't keep up :P

which might be visible on matrix?

<fungible.:matrix.org> youtube.com/watch?v=NQsQviHLZsE

<fungible.:matrix.org> (use a privacy respecting youtube frontend)

<fungible.:matrix.org> phones are not secure

i said "depending on your device"

most phones don't even meet the security standard

because they don't put any budget towards it

the only few phones i can think of are google pixels

any budget or effort*

not to mention most phones spend most of their life EOL because the updates are tied to the manufacturer and you can't install an alternative OS...

^

<fungible.:matrix.org> was always able to install cyanogenmod.... idk what u talking about tbh

<fungible.:matrix.org> anyways, back to watching the youtube or whatever idk

<fungible.:matrix.org> latta o/

even if you setup everything right on a crappy phone, the feds can just find a vulnerability in the bootloader

and compromise the ROM within

Isn't Cyanogenmod an old thing by now? The one I hear about the most is Lineage, but the problem is that a lot of common manufacturers don't even allow bootloader unlocking.

fungible.: well, think, how have you been able to install cyanogenmod? :P

if you didn't unlock your bootloader officially, you probably used a tool that exploited a vulnerability within the bootloader

ye it's been discontinued for a decade now

to unlock it

I mean Cyanogen - Wiki says it's been developed between 2009 and 2016.

<fungible.:matrix.org> right, proves the point, phones not secure

crappy phones not secure

github.com/zenfyrdev/bootloader-unlock-wall-of-shame - it's pretty bad. Xiaomi is technically possible but in practice effectively not, for example.

the good ones are the ones that nobody can unlock outside the official way

and even then, there are a lot more on top of that

(excluding those phone manufacturers like Xiaomi that fucking suck)

Huawei doesn't even have the "technicality" that Xiaomi does

RDLOCK is the unlock method that can only be done by service centers and the factory

and it's permanent

so what chinese people would do, is take their huawei phones to repair and snatch the phone out of their hands after they've done RDLOCK

The clips I've seen were marked as Xiaomi, but might be that the same applies to Huawei too.

The fact that they take such risks makes me wonder - just how hard it is to get a phone there that unlocks more sanely? Like, maybe one that's not sold officially. I tried searching, but haven't found a coherent answer, at least in English.

vtnerd how do you know that sub setting worked? there is nothing in the logs at startup?? my issue is still there and I would like to fix it, I have added --zmq-pub=tcp://127.0.0.1:18084 to monerod and --sub=tcp://127.0.0.1:18084 to monero-lws

plowsof you don't have the same issue as me? you are able to send the funds right after transaction is confirmed?

<plowsof:matrix.org> johny__ ive found that i have to wait a long time to where i think 'does this even work / is it broken?' when i receive funds and waiting to spend them - eventually though im able to send

plowsof does that mean you have the same issue as me?

if this is specifically about monero-lws being slow when funds are unlocked and should be spendable (balance taking time to update etc) then yes, same issue. is this a known issue vtnerd?

can you merge-mine to multiple addresses in p2pool?

or is that like dumb

i wanted to like split my hashrate across some addresses as donation

<fungible.:matrix.org> smh

plowsof are you able to see zmq sub logs if you switch to log level 3? I can't find any

Hey do you mean Cindy

What*

Merge mine to multiple?

You mean give % off to each one?

go-p2pool allows you to specify the address via --user field on stratum directlt

Makes this easier to do, can mine at the same time on different addresses

<diego:cypherstack.com> Try it out! We are indeed in a much better place than a few years ago > <@fungible.:matrix.org> like at this point i dont even know what to shill lmao

DataHoarder: yes, give % off to each one

you can implement a wrapper over that tbh

or edit the stratum select on my code :D

it handles switching user better (designed for it)

honestly, at a level above the p2pool server

yeah. but C p2pool won't let you do that as easy

with go p2pool you can just change xmrproxy code or something else

i wanted to see if like xmrig could do this for example

use api to look at share % instead of just time mining

like merge mine from different servers

merge mine is something that the underlying program that generates the work has to do

not xmrig

xmrig mainly just churns through nonces in an efficient manner

hm

well, xmrig has a 1% donate thing

could that be modified to allow hashrate sharing across different servers

--donate 0 :D

no i mean like

it's single time

but yes

you can specify donation target

80% to server A, 10% to server B, 10% to server C

that allows you two 50/50 :)

<ofrnxmr> it just switched the pool address for 1min / 100mins

<ravfx:xmr.mx> Not on gentoo

<ravfx:xmr.mx> -donate USE (I think)

exactly, and i was thinking if the time sharing thing could be used to mine for multiple servers

<ofrnxmr> You can split work to many diff addresses by just tunning xmrig N times

instead of just one (and occassionally the donate server)

<ofrnxmr> Running*

you can do that on xmrig-proxy tbh

ofrnxmr: each of the xmrigs allocate their own dataset and stuff, that'd be a waste of RAM

<ofrnxmr> U sure?

<ravfx:xmr.mx> @ofrnxmr: Yeah. And just set a different number of cores for the different xmrig

well i don't think xmrig takes advantage of shared memory

so each one has their own dataset

<ravfx:xmr.mx> So more trashing?

<ofrnxmr> would have to re-test it, but i used to do this all the time

<vtnerd> plowsof: This is not a known issue. There are people using it for immediate webhook notifications with no known delays

DataHoarder: well good to hear

sgp_^

<vtnerd> johny__: There aren't any specific logs afaik, should probably add some, rather the notification about block scanning will immediately trigger if zmq pub/sub is working correctly

<kekzploit:matrix.org> Guys is there some Linux ARM build?

kekzploit: for what

<stormyyy:stormyyy.xyz> @kekzploit:matrix.org: you mean like linux distros that work on ARM?

monero has linux ARM builds

and RISC-V builds too

<stormyyy:stormyyy.xyz> Cindy: ... this makes more sense than what my brain thought

lol

<kekzploit:matrix.org> yes just for the raspberry pi

you haven't mentioned what program specifically though

<kekzploit:matrix.org> im trying to import blockchain.raw but getting issues

is it monerod? monero wallet gui?

<hooftly:matrix.org> I have a question.github.com/monero-project/monero/releases/tag/v0.18.4.3

<hooftly:matrix.org> There is a linux armv8 build available

<kekzploit:matrix.org> sorry, monerod and all the extras, Linux RPI5, ubuntu server

<kekzploit:matrix.org> with an i2p proxy to top it off

yes monero offers builds for armv7 and armv88

armv8*

<kekzploit:matrix.org> thanks guys

if that doesn't really fit your arch, you can always compile yourself

<kekzploit:matrix.org> arm 7 or 8 for rpi5?

<kekzploit:matrix.org> 8

RPI5 has ARMv8

<vtnerd> @vtnerd: There should be a warning message if the pub/sub isn't working. Lws will indicate a timeout for pub/sub occurred

vtnerd I made the changes you advised me but I am still unable to send the funds right after the tx is confirmed, plowsof is also saying he has same issue, would it be possible to know what we are doing wrong?

vtnerd I have no warning message that pub sub isn't working and I have a good computer

<ofrnxmr> What wallet r u using?

I am using monero-lws with mymonero-web-js

everything is working great except the issue I have mentioned

<kojikyo:matrix.org> I have a question, are mobile wallet app like phantom secure ?

depends on your phone

like literally that's what it comes down to

security of these apps don't mean anything if your phone has the security of a cheeto lock on a door

<kojikyo:matrix.org> Cindy: Well my phone probably sucks at security, it's an old huawei. Should I just use wallet on a pc, or is there way to do is safely ?

use wallet on a PC i guess

does your PC have Secure Boot?

<kojikyo:matrix.org> Cindy: yeah, it's pretty recent so i guess it do

you can encrypt your drive with LUKS and also enroll your linux distro's keys into secure boot

that should provide good security against unauthorized software modification and such

(that a old huawei phone wouldn't have :P)

<kojikyo:matrix.org> Cindy: But if i just want to use cryptos a little, nothing really important and not much money, would it be a problem to use my phone ?

well if you don't consider it very important then sure

it's all about threat model

<ravfx:xmr.mx> Cindy: can also use the tpm.

<ravfx:xmr.mx> To detivate your key basec on gpg encrypted payload + content of some of the PCR registers

<ravfx:xmr.mx> Be careful what pcr register to use.

<ravfx:xmr.mx> One of them get altered by cmos change and another by efi partition (so bootloader update change it).

<ravfx:xmr.mx> PCR 7 is based on secureboot validity so maybe only that one can be used